RT Book, Section A1 Pack, Allan I. A2 Grippi, Michael A. A2 Antin-Ozerkis, Danielle E. A2 Dela Cruz, Charles S. A2 Kotloff, Robert M. A2 Kotton, Camille Nelson A2 Pack, Allan I. SR Print(0) ID 1194946119 T1 Sleep and Circadian Rhythms T2 Fishman’s Pulmonary Diseases and Disorders, 6e YR 2023 FD 2023 PB McGraw-Hill Education PP New York, NY SN 9781260473988 LK accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1194946119 RD 2025/03/18 AB Sleep and circadian rhythm are highly coupled processes. In the original formulation they were considered independent but interacting. Borbely and colleagues1–4 posited that the circadian process (Process C) had a 24-hour rhythm that interacted with the sleep drive system (Process S) (Fig. 12-1). Process S is envisaged to be like an old-fashioned egg timer. The drive for sleep is at a very low level following the major sleep bout and increases progressively as wakefulness proceeds, i.e., the drive to sleep is related to the duration of prior wakefulness. Humans are programmed to sustain wakefulness for 16 hours but beyond this develop progressive performance impairments. During the day the drive to sleep is counteracted by an alertness signal from the clock. When this alertness signal declines later in the evening, the sleep drive is unopposed, and sleep ensues. During sleep the drive to sleep progressively declines, i.e., the egg timer is flipped, and the sands recover (Fig. 12-1). The situation is actually more complex than this since sleepiness occurs at two times of day, i.e., siesta time in early afternoon and late in the evening. While these processes were initially considered independent, they are not at a molecular level.5,6 Core clock molecules increase their expression in brain when sleep is deprived.7 Moreover, mutations of a clock-associated gene—DEC2, now called BHLEH41—result in short sleep in humans (<6 hours) without evidence of daytime performance impairment.8,9