RT Book, Section
A1 Inozu, Bahadir
A1 Chauncey, Dan
A1 Kamataris, Vickie
A1 Mount, Charles
SR Print(0)
ID 1150286944
T1 Reliability and Validity of Assessment Measures
T2 Performance Improvement for Healthcare: Leading Change with Lean, Six Sigma, and Constraints Management
YR 2018
FD 2018
PB McGraw-Hill Education
PP New York, NY
SN 9780071761628
LK accessmedicine.mhmedical.com/content.aspx?aid=1150286944
RD 2024/04/25
AB A  great  deal  of  effort  was  expended  to  ensure  both  the  reliability  and  validity  of  these  assessments.  Internal  consistency  was  used  as  the  approach  in  measuring  reliability.  Each  assessment  was  meant  to  be  administered  multiple  times  to  skilled  practitioners  to  rate  organizations  with  which  they  had  been  associated.  During  each  assessment's  development,  the  internal  consistency  of  each  construct  was  measured  using  Cronbach's  coefficient  alpha,  which  is  the  most  common  statistic  used  to  quantify  the  degree  to  which  all  items  within  a  given  construct  measure  the  same  attribute.  Based  on  a  review  of  scholarly  literature,  a  minimum  alpha  level  of  0.7  was  applied.  Only  items  that  were  included  in  the  final  alpha  calculation  are  included  in  the  instrument.  The  range  across  all  constructs  of  the  performance  improvement  maturity  assessment  was  between  0.8147  and  0.9085.  The  range  across  all  constructs  for  the  change-readiness  assessment  was  between  0.8212  and  0.9085