Skip to Main Content

We have a new app!

Take the Access library with you wherever you go—easy access to books, videos, images, podcasts, personalized features, and more.

Download the Access App here: iOS and Android. Learn more here!

  1. What are the major categories of fever of unknown origin (FUO)?

  2. What basic tests should be done in evaluating patients with FUO?

  3. When is more specific laboratory testing or diagnostic imaging indicated?

  4. Which patients should receive empiric therapy?

  5. What is the prognosis of FUO?

The classic definition of fever of unknown origin (FUO) by Petersdorf and Beeson in 1961 was a fever greater than 38.3°C (101°F) on several occasions, persisting without diagnosis for at least 3 weeks, in spite of 1 week's investigation in hospital. In the 50 years since, medical practice has changed substantially, and much of the diagnostic evaluation for FUO can be accomplished on an outpatient basis. One proposed revision of the classic definition of FUO defines it as a febrile illness that has not been diagnosed after at least three outpatient visits or 3 days of hospitalization (Table 191-1). In practice, while an exact definition is difficult, FUO can be thought of as a persistent febrile illness that has eluded diagnosis despite a thorough history, physical examination, and routine diagnostic testing. Additionally, several specific categories of FUO have been proposed, including nosocomial FUO, HIV-related FUO, and FUO in the returning traveler. Over 200 different causes of FUO have been reported, but all etiologies fall into four broad groups: infectious, neoplastic, rheumatologic, and miscellaneous. The incidence of each etiology will vary with different patient populations and geographic locations.

Table 191-1 Contemporary Definitions of Fever of Unknown Origin (FUO)

Pop-up div Successfully Displayed

This div only appears when the trigger link is hovered over. Otherwise it is hidden from view.