What is the diagnostic approach to cancer of unknown primary?
How should patients with unknown primary be evaluated?
What are the common clinical presentations of cancer of unknown primary?
What is the management strategy of patients with no identifiable primary site?
Cancer of unknown primary site (CUP) is described as histologically confirmed metastases with no identifiable primary site of origin. The majority of malignancies present with an obvious primary site, whereas CUP has a reported incidence of 2.3% to 7.8% in international databases. Prostate, lung, breast, and colorectal have remained the top four primary sites of cancer for most of this decade (Figure 184-1).
Top ten cancer sites in 2006—males and females (per 100,000).
Of the over 1.5 million new cancer cases estimated to be diagnosed in the United States in 2010, 30,000 cases were reported without an identifiable source, similar to the number of new cases of pancreatic cancer diagnosed each year. After appropriate evaluation, less than 25% of these patients will have a primary site identified.
The median age of CUP patients is 60 years, with males being more affected than females. The prognosis is dismal, with median survivals ranging from 11 weeks to 11 months, a 1-year survival rate of less than 25%, and a 5-year overall survival rate of approximately 11%. However, with the advancement of diagnostic tools and techniques, the ability to identify a primary site has improved over time, allowing for treatment plans specific to the primary site.
While CUP may be a distinct biologic and clinical entity, a few theories attempt to explain the biology behind CUP. There are many debatable hypotheses as follows:
- The primary tumor remains microscopic and escapes detection.
- The primary tumor spontaneously regresses after seeding the metastatic site—the “burned out primary.” For example, testicular scarring is sometimes seen in metastatic germ cell tumors.
- The embryonic epithelial cells that fail to appropriately migrate may undergo malignant transformation and result in a cancer of unknown primary. Extragonadal germ cell tumors in the mediastinum and undescended testes illustrate this biologic theory.
- Aberrations in genetic and molecular profiles may also explain the origin of CUP.
Whatever the explanation, the clinical and biologic aggressiveness of cancer of unknown primary is well appreciated.
Despite the lack of a known primary site, CUP can still be classified in histologic categories, allowing for better differentiation and treatment (Table 184-1).
Table 184-1 Histologic Variants |Favorite Table|Download (.pdf)
Table 184-1 Histologic Variants
|Poorly differentiated carcinoma||15–20%|
|Squamous cell carcinoma||5%|
|Poorly differentiated neoplasm||< 5%|
These categories include adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma, neuroendocrine carcinoma, poorly differentiated carcinoma, and poorly differentiated neoplasm. The latter is a vague label, as the tissue ...