Chapter 2. Endocrine Autoimmunity

• AADC Aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase
• ACA Antibodies recognizing the adrenal cortex
• ADCC Antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytoxicity
• AICD Activation-induced cell death
• AIRE Autoimmune regulator gene
• APECED Autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy
• APS Autommune polyglandular syndrome
• BB Bio breeding
• BCR B-cell receptor
• cAMP Cyclic adenosine monophosphate
• CaSR Calcium-sensing receptor
• CD Cluster of differentiation
• CTLA Cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen
• DPT Diabetes Prevention Trial
• FOXP3 Forkhead box P3
• GABA Gamma-aminobutyric acid
• GAD Glutamic acid decarboxylase
• HLA Human leukocyte antigen
• IA-2 Islet cell antigen-2 (tyrosine phosphatase)
• IFN Interferon
• IL Interleukin
• IPEX Immunodeficiency, polyendocrinopathy, and enteropathy, x-linked
• LFA Lymphocyte function-associated antigen
• MHC Major histocompatibility complex
• NALP1 NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 1
• NALP5 NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5
• NK Natural killer (cells)
• NOD Nonobese diabetic (mice)
• SCA Steroid-producing cell antibodies
• SCID Spontaneous combined immunodeficiency
• TAP Transporter associated with antigen processing
• TBI Thyrotropin-binding inhibition
• TCR T-cell receptor
• TD Thymus-dependent
• Tg Thyroglobulin
• TI Thymus-independent
• TNF Tumor necrosis factor
• TPO Thyroperoxidase
• TSH Thyroid-stimulating hormone
• TSH-R Thyrotropin receptor
• TSI Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulin
• VNTR Variable number of tandem repeats

Epidemiologic analysis of a large population reported that about 1 of 30 (3.2%) people in the United States (more than 8.5 million individuals) are currently affected by autoimmune diseases. Graves disease, type 1 diabetes, pernicious anemia, rheumatoid arthritis, Hashimoto thyroiditis, and vitiligo are the most prevalent such conditions, accounting for 93% of affected individuals. A more global approach at calculating prevalence led to a corrected estimate between 7.6% and 9.4% of the world's population as affected by autoimmune diseases (2.5 in 30 people worldwide).

These autoimmune diseases have traditionally been looked upon as forming a spectrum. At one end are found organ-specific diseases with organ-specific targets. Hashimoto thyroiditis is an example in which a specific lesion affects the thyroid (lymphocytic infiltration, destruction of follicular cells) and autoantibodies are produced with absolute specificity for thyroid proteins. At the other end of the spectrum are the systemic autoimmune diseases, broadly belonging to the class of rheumatologic disorders. Systemic lupus erythematosus is an example of a disease characterized by widespread pathologic changes and a collection of autoantibodies to DNA and other nuclear constituents of all cells. Many organ-specific autoimmune diseases are autoimmune endocrinopathies. Furthermore, most endocrine glands are subject to autoimmune attack including the adrenals (autoimmune Addison disease), gonads (autoimmune oophoritis), pancreas (type 1 diabetes), pituitary (autoimmune hypophysitis), and thyroid (autoimmune thyroid disease) (Table 2–1).

By far the most common autoimmune endocrine diseases are those involving the thyroid and type 1 diabetes. When the target is the thyroid gland and the clinical manifestation is hypothyroidism (Hashimoto thyroiditis), the prevalence is about 1%. When the manifestation is hyperthyroidism (Graves disease), the prevalence is about 0.4%. Both thyroid autoimmune disorders affect women preferentially. When the targets of the autoimmune response are the β cells of the pancreas, the clinical presentation is type 1 diabetes. The prevalence of type 1 diabetes is close to that of Graves disease (0.2%-0.5%); however, it has no gender predilection.

Basic immunologic concepts as they apply to clinical autoimmune endocrine diseases as sole entities and as polyglandular failure syndromes are reviewed in this chapter.

The immune system is constantly confronted with a variety of molecules and recognizes them as either self or foreign. The adaptive immune system has evolved to recognize virtually any foreign molecule, either in existence or yet to come. The repertoire of immune recognition molecules randomly formed by gene rearrangements is not limited by the genetic information encoded in the genome (Figure 2–1). As a result, an enormously wide array of immune recognition molecules is acquired by the human immune system. By way of illustration, the theoretical diversity of T-cell receptors (T-cell recognition molecules) by random rearrangements reaches 1015. This mechanism of rearrangement also applies to B-cell recognition molecules (ie, immunoglobulins). The random mechanism of gene rearrangement, however, produces immune recognition molecules that react with self components. Potentially dangerous immune cells carrying self-reactive recognition molecules are eliminated (negatively selected) during development of T lymphocytes in the thymus and of B lymphocytes in the bone marrow. It appears that only immune cells which react with foreign antigen strongly and with self antigen very weakly are positively selected and comprise the peripheral immune cell repertoire. This selection mechanism of immune cells is termed “central tolerance.” Self-reactive immune cells that skip central tolerance and reach the periphery are managed by other control mechanisms against autoimmunity and are either eliminated, rendered unresponsive, or suppressed (“peripheral tolerance”). Failures in these mechanisms of immunologic regulation, as proposed by Mackay and Burnet in 1964, are central features of the concept of autoimmunity.

T and B lymphocytes are the fundamental and predominant immune cells. T lymphocyte precursors (pre-T cells) originate in the bone marrow and migrate to the thymus, where they undergo maturation and differentiation. At early stages, they express several T-cell surface molecules but still have genomic (not rearranged) configuration of their T-cell receptors (TCRs). These pre-T cells, destined to become T cells with TCR α/β chains (T α/β cells), pass through a critical phase during which self-reactive T cells are deleted by negative selection (see T-Cell Tolerance, later in this chapter). Few pre-T cells will express other types of chains on their TCR (T γ/δ cells). T α/β cells differentiate into either mature CD4 or CD8 cells. These now mature lymphocytes migrate to T-cell areas of peripheral lymphoid organs and exert their function as helper (TH) or cytotoxic (TC) cells when activated.

B lymphocytes mature and differentiate in the bone marrow and then migrate to the B-cell areas of lymphoid organs. Influenced by factors derived from TH cells previously activated by professional antigen-presenting cells (APCs) such as macrophages, some B cells differentiate to become immunoglobulin M (IgM)-producing cells (plasma cells). Most of the other activated B cells that do not differentiate into plasma cells revert to the resting state to become memory B cells. When memory B cells are further activated, two events occur: isotype switching (immunoglobulin class switching) and hypermutation of the immunoglobulin-variable region to further increase diversity and specificity (affinity maturation).

Activation of B cells requires recognition of the antigen as a whole, while T cells require recognition of antigenic peptides bound to major histocompatibility complex (MHC) molecules on the surfaces of professional APCs. Therefore, T-cell recognition is said to be MHC restricted.

The human MHC (human leukocyte antigen; HLA) consists of a linked set of genes encoding major glycoproteins involved in antigen presentation (Figure 2–2). The complex locates to the short arm of chromosome 6 and divides into three separate regions: class I, class II, and class III genes. The class I “classic” region encodes HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C loci; the nonclassic or class I-related region encodes HLA-E, HLA-F, and HLA-G loci and other immunity-related genes such as CD1. The class II region (HLA-D) encodes HLA-DP, HLA-DQ, and HLA-DR loci and other genes related to antigen processing, transport, and presentation, such as, transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP). The class III region encodes genes for tumor necrosis factors α and β (TNF-α and TNF-β); complement factors C2, C4, and B; and the steroidogenic enzyme 21-hydroxylase. MHC class I (classic) molecules are found on all somatic cells, whereas MHC class I nonclassic antigens are expressed only on some (eg, HLA-F on fetal liver, HLA-G on placental tissues). CD1 molecules are expressed on Langerhans cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and B cells (all professional APCs). MHC class II molecules are exclusively expressed on these professional APCs. However, virtually all cells except mature erythrocytes can express MHC class II molecules under particular conditions (eg, stimulation with interferon-γ [IFN-γ]). As a general rule, MHC class I molecules present peptides derived from endogenous antigens that have access to cytosolic cell compartments (eg, virus) to CD8 TC cells. On the other hand, MHC class II molecules present peptides derived from antigens internalized by endocytosis into vesicular compartments (eg, bacteria) to CD4 TH cells. MHC class II molecules also bind peptides derived from many membrane-bound self antigens.

APCs process and present antigen in order to activate T cells utilizing MHC-peptide presentation (Figure 2–3). T cells require at least two signals to become activated. The interaction of a TCR expressed on antigen-specific T cells and the antigenic peptide–MHC complex expressed on APCs provides the first signal. The second signal is delivered primarily by the interaction between costimulatory molecules CD80 (B7.1) and CD86 (B7.2) on APCs and CD28 on T cells. These two signals induce proliferation of T cells, production of interleukin-2 (IL-2), and expression of the antiapoptotic protein Bcl-xL. TH cells and TC cells are effector cells that require both signals in order to become activated. However, TC cells also need the “help” provided by TH cells. Until recently, it was thought that TH and TC cells needed to interact with the same APC simultaneously and that cytokines (such as IL-2) produced by the TH cell would then act on the TC cell to facilitate its response. New studies suggest that the interaction between another costimulatory molecule, CD40 ligand (CD154), present on T cells, and CD40, present on APCs, may provide an alternative explanation. It appears that TH cells–recognizing antigenic peptides presented by APCs deliver a signal through the CD154–CD40 complex that “licenses” APCs to directly stimulate TC cells (Figure 2–4). Thus, there is no need for simultaneous interactions of TH and TC cells while encountering the APC. CD154–CD40 interaction also enhances expression of CD80 and CD86 as well as secretion of cytokines (IL-1, -6, -8, -10, and -12 and TNF-α).

Yet another molecule on T cells, the CD28 homolog cytotoxic T lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA-4 or CD152), functions to suppress T-cell responses (see Figure 2–3). CD152 is expressed at low to undetectable levels on resting T cells. It is upregulated by the ligation of CD28 on T cells with CD80/86 on APCs, or by IL-2. CD152 and CD28 on T cells share the same counterreceptors, namely, CD80/86 on APCs. However, CD152 has a 20-fold higher affinity than CD28 for their ligands.

The integration of all these interactions may be as follows (see Figure 2–3): After processing antigen, APCs deliver an antigen-specific first signal through the MHC-peptide–TCR interaction on T cells. A second signal is provided by a costimulatory interaction of the CD80/86–CD28 complex that induces the expression of CD154 first and then CD152. Binding of CD154 on TH cells with CD40 on APCs enhances expression of CD80/86 and licenses APCs for direct activation of TC cells. Other inflammatory cytokines as well as lipopolysaccharides and viruses may do the same. The increased expression of APC–CD80/86 and consequent binding of CD28 on T cells then perpetuates the activation and proliferation of these effector cells. However, the expression of CD152 48 to 72 hours after T-cell activation leads to the preferential binding of this molecule to CD80/86 on APCs because of its higher affinity for CD80/86. This may displace CD28 from CD80/86 and, in turn, suppress T-cell activity. This sequence of complex events is probably simplistic relative to what nature has to offer. A new B7 family of receptors has been reported: some with positive costimulatory capacity, many with a role in downregulating immune responses, yet others with dual functions. For some of these pathways such as B7H3/H4 (expressed in APCs with unknown counterreceptor on T cells), very little is known, but even for those pathways that have been extensively studied, such as the CD80/86:CD28/CTLA-4 (mentioned above); B7h:ICOS (inducible costimulator) and PD-L1/PD-L2:PD1, new insights are still being generated. The intricacies of controlling T-cell activation are enhanced by the complexity of the costimulatory pathways, such that there are multiple possible receptor–ligand interactions.

Activation and differentiation of B cells often require two signals also. Naive B cells are triggered by antigen but may also require accessory signals that come from activated TH cells. Some antigens can directly activate naive B cells without the need for TH cells (eg, lipopolysaccharides from gram-negative bacteria or polymeric protein structures). The former type of B-cell activation (MHC class II-restricted T cell help) is called thymus-dependent (TD). The latter type is called thymus-independent (TI). TH cells also control isotype switching and initiate somatic hypermutation of antibody variable-region genes (see Tolerance, later). Interaction between CD154 on TH cells and CD40 on B cells and the cytokines produced by TH cells are essential for isotype switching and formation of germinal centers in peripheral lymphoid organs. The immunoglobulin isotype switching is critical for the generation of functional diversity of a humoral immune response. Somatic hypermutation (point mutations of the variable-region genes of immunoglobulins during the course of an immune response) is necessary for the affinity maturation of antibodies.

Overall, the immune response is a combination of effector mechanisms that function to eliminate pathogenic organisms. These effector mechanisms include, as innate immunity, phagocytosis (by macrophages, neutrophils, monocytes, and dendritic cells) and cytotoxicity (by natural killer [NK] cells); and as adaptive immunity, antibody-dependent complement-mediated cytotoxicity, antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity (ADCC), cytotoxicity by T γ/δ cells that recognize heat shock proteins on target cells, and cytotoxicity by CD8 or CD4 TC cells. CD8 and CD4 TC cells are activated by the described recognition of specific antigenic peptides bound to class I (for CD8), class II (for CD4) MHC molecules on the APCs and classically by IL-2 from nearby activated CD4 TH cells. These cells kill the target by either secreting cytotoxins (perforin, granzyme) or by inducing apoptosis through the Fas–FasL (Fas ligand) interaction (killer cells carrying FasL molecules activate programmed cell death in target cells expressing Fas molecules). FasL or CD95L is a type II transmembrane protein that belongs to the TNF family. The binding of FasL with its receptor induces apoptosis. FasL–Fas receptor interactions play an important role in the regulation of the immune system.

The specificity of the immune response is crucial if self-reactivity is to be avoided. In order to ensure that lymphocyte responses and the downstream effector mechanisms they control are directed exclusively against foreign antigens and not against “self” components, a number of safety-check barriers must be negotiated before autoreactive lymphocytes can differentiate and proliferate.

T-Cell Tolerance

T cells developing in the thymus (pre-T cells) are destined to become T α/β cells through rearrangement of the TCR β gene initially, followed by the TCR α gene (Figure 2–5). If unproductive rearrangements of TCR genes occur (nonfunctional TCR α or β proteins), apoptosis of these pre-T cells follows (Figure 2–5A). If functional rearrangements of TCR α and β proteins occur, cells express TCR α/β dimer and CD3 molecules at low levels on the cell surface. TCR-rearranged cells proliferate 100-fold. Positive and negative selection occurs based on the ability of the rearranged TCR α/β to recognize antigenic peptides in association with self-MHC molecules on thymic epithelial and dendritic cells. Negative selection (clonal deletion) appears to take place in the thymus medulla, where pre-T cells–bearing TCRs specific for self peptides bound to self-MHC molecules are deleted. At least 97% of developing T cells undergo apoptosis within the thymus (central tolerance). Positively selected pre-T cells increase expression of TCR α/β, express either CD4 or CD8, and become mature T cells. These mature T cells exit the thymus and go to the periphery. CD4 T cells are activated in the periphery in an MHC class II-restricted fashion, while CD8 T cells are activated in an MHC class I-restricted fashion.

A differential avidity model in which the fate of T cells is determined by the intrinsic affinity of TCRs for their ligands has been advanced to explain the paradox between positive and negative selection. According to this model, T cells with high avidity for MHC-self peptide complexes would be eliminated (negative selection), whereas T cells with low avidity to MHC-self peptide complexes would be positively selected. If the avidity is close to zero, T cells would not be selected (for lack of effective signal to survive). The biochemical factor or factors that signal survival (low avidity of TCR binding) versus apoptosis (triggered by high avidity interactions) have yet to be found.

Costimulatory interactions between CD28 and CD80/86 and between CD154, CD40, and adhesion molecules, such as lymphocyte function-associated antigen-1 (LFA-1), are also involved in preferential deletion of self-reactive T cells in the medullary region of the thymus. It is known that negative selection is not 100% effective and that some potentially autoreactive T cells do escape to the periphery. Not all self peptides would be presented to pre-T cells during their development in the thymus. Self peptides derived from secluded proteins (ie, intracytoplasmic enzymes) only timely expressed after rigid regulatory control (ie, puberty) in endocrine glands are believed to be a likely source. Therefore, the peripheral immune system must maintain tolerance through complementary control mechanisms.

“Peripheral tolerance” (Figure 2–5B) may be maintained by the induction of unresponsiveness to self antigen (anergy) or by the induction of regulatory T cells (T regs), such as suppressor T cells (active suppression). Peripheral clonal deletion (apoptosis) of autoreactive T cells that have escaped from the thymus may play an important role in limiting rapidly expanding responses, but there are many examples where autoreactive T cells persist. Some autoreactive T cells may never encounter the self antigen because it may be sequestered from the immune system (ignorance). Lastly, immune deviation, whereby noninflammatory TH2 responses suppress an autoreactive inflammatory TH1 response, inducing peripheral tolerance, deserves further discussion. TH1 cells, which regulate cell-mediated responses, secrete IFN-γ and small amounts of IL-4. In contrast, TH2 cells, which provide help for antibody production, secrete abundant IL-4 and little IFN-γ. A prevailing concept in human autoimmunity is that TH1 responses are believed to dominate. It has been shown in animal models that induction of TH2 responses ameliorates TH1 responses. Hence, unbalanced TH1 immune deviation may lead to a breakage of peripheral tolerance. However, evidence to the contrary exists in some endocrinopathies. (See autoimmune response in the section on Autoimmune Aspects of Thyroid Disease, later in the chapter.)

Clonal deletion and anergy occur through apoptosis at the site of activation or after passage through the liver. High antigen dose and chronic stimulation induce peripheral elimination of both CD4 and CD8 T cells. Activated T cells express Fas molecules on their surfaces but are resistant to FasL-mediated apoptosis because of the simultaneous expression of Bcl-xL (apoptosis-resistance molecules), induced by CD28 ligation during activation (see Immune Recognition and Response, earlier in the chapter). Several days after activation, when Bcl-xL has declined, CD4 cells become susceptible to Fas-mediated apoptosis (activation-induced cell death; AICD). A similar mechanism via p75 tumor necrosis factor (TNF) receptor has been shown for CD8 cells. Therefore, autoreactive T cells might be deleted by apoptosis induced by chronic stimulation with self antigens, present abundantly in the periphery. However, autoreactive T cells specific for very rare self antigens may be difficult to eliminate.

Anergy also results from the lack of a second costimulatory signal. When nonhematopoietic cells stimulated by IFN-γ present antigen in an MHC class II-restricted fashion (as thyrocytes do in AITD), autoreactive T cells may be rendered unresponsive because of the absence of a CD28–CD80/86-mediated signal (nonhematopoietic cells do not express CD80/86 as professional APCs do). However, even if the two signals are provided, anergy may result from the lack of TH cell-originated cytokines (IL-2, -4, -7, etc). It has also been shown that in vivo T-cell anergy may be induced by CD80/86–CD152 interaction (see also Immune Recognition and Response, discussed earlier).

T-cell active suppression is considered to be a major regulatory mechanism of peripheral tolerance; however, its mode of action is still under study. As mentioned above, nonhematopoietic cells stimulated by IFN-γ present antigen in an MHC class II-restricted fashion to T cells and render them anergic. These nonhematopoietic cells (nonprofessional APCs) may also present to CD4 T-suppressor cells (TS, also known as CD4 + CD25 + FOXP3 + regulatory T cells, T regs). Before becoming unresponsive, these cells may induce specific CD8 T suppressor (TS) cells. In turn, these CD8 TS cells may regulate (via T-cell-suppressor factors or cytotoxicity) autoreactive T cells (see also Figure 2–5B).

B-Cell Tolerance

Instead of the thymus, the bone marrow provides the setting for central B-cell tolerance. Pre-B cells rearrange their B-cell receptor (BCR or membrane-bound immunoglobulin) early in development. The immunoglobulin heavy (H) chain genes rearrange first, followed by light (L) chain gene rearrangement. Unproductive rearrangements and pairings leading to formation of nonfunctional immunoglobulin drive pre-B cells to apoptosis (Figure 2–6A). Functional rearrangements (functional BCRs) allow immature B-cell expansion and expression of IgM and CD21 (a marker of functionality). Only one-third of the precursor cells reach this stage. The random rearrangement of the V, D, and J segments of immunoglobulin genes during this period inevitably generates self-recognizing immunoglobulins. Negative selection of autoreactive B cells occurs at the immature B cell stage on the basis of the avidity of the BCR for self antigens. Similar to the T-cell clonal deletion, immature B cells that strongly bind antigens in the bone marrow are eliminated by apoptosis. Some autoreactive immature B cells, instead of undergoing apoptosis, resume rearrangements of their L-chain genes in an attempt to reassemble new κ or λ genes. This procedure, called BCR editing, permanently inactivates the autoreactive immunoglobulin genes. Soluble antigens, presumably because they generate weaker signals through the BCR of immature B cells, do not cause apoptosis but render cells unresponsive to stimuli (anergy). These anergic B cells migrate to the periphery, where they express IgD. They may be activated under special circumstances, making anergy less than sufficient as a mechanism of enforcing tolerance. Only immature B cells in the bone marrow with no avidity for antigens (membrane-bound or soluble) become mature B cells with the capacity to express both IgM and IgD. As with T cells, 97% of developing B cells undergo apoptosis within the bone marrow. Also, and as with T cells, central clonal deletion, anergy, and BCR editing eliminates autoreactive B cells, recognizing bone marrow-derived self antigens.

Peripheral B-cell tolerance (Figure 2–6B) is also crucial for protection against autoimmunity. It appears that in the absence of antigen, mature B cells are actively eliminated in the periphery by activated T cells via Fas–FasL and CD40–CD154 interactions. In the presence of specific antigen but without T-cell help, antigen recognition by BCRs induces apoptosis or anergy of mature B cells. If antigen and specific T-cell help are provided—that is, if antigen bound to the BCR is internalized, processed, and presented in an MHC class II-restricted fashion to a previously activated TH cell specific for the same antigen—two events occur. One, the B cell becomes an IgM-secreting plasma cell, and—in the presence of the appropriate cytokines and after expression of CD40 (for TH cell CD154 interaction)—class switching occurs. Two, further somatic hypermutation of the immunoglobulin variable region genes of such mature B cells, which changes affinity of BCRs for antigens, also occurs in germinal centers (see also Immune Recognition and Response, discussed earlier). Mutants with low-affinity receptors undergo apoptosis, while enhanced-affinity BCRs are positively selected. In the presence of CD40 ligation of CD154, antigen-stimulated B cells become memory B cells (see Figure 2–6B).

The ability of mature B cells to capture very low quantities of antigen via high-affinity BCRs allows them to amplify their antigen-presenting capacity to more than 1000 times that of other professional APCs. This particular property may become critical in the development of chronic organ-specific autoimmune diseases in which the source of antigen is limited. Thus, autoreactive B cells that happen to escape the control mechanisms described could amplify and perpetuate autoimmune responses in patients with failing endocrine organs when tissue destruction has left only minute amounts of residual antigen.

Although the breakage of self-tolerance seems to be a central pathogenic step in the development of autoimmune diseases, autoimmunity is a multifactorial event. Specifically, defects in apoptosis-related molecules (Fas–FasL) of thymic dendritic cells have been shown to impair central clonal deletion. Also, in the periphery, similar defects (Fas–FasL, CD152) on T cell-APC molecules may prevent apoptosis of autoreactive T cells. However, it is difficult to consider these general defects as causative of organ-specific disorders. Furthermore, clonal ignorance of T cells cannot be maintained if antigens sequestered from the immune system are released in blood or if cryptic epitopes of antigens that have never been recognized by the immune system are presented to T cells for recognition (after tissue destruction, for example). Defects of active suppression (T regs dysfunction, CTLA-4 downregulation), immune deviation (TH1/TH2 imbalance), and defects in B-cell tolerance may all be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune diseases. How and why loss of immune self-tolerance occurs is not completely understood. Both genetic and environmental factors appear to be necessary.

Epidemiologic studies demonstrate that susceptibility to most autoimmune diseases has a significant genetic component. In type 1 diabetes, for example, there is a clear association between race and susceptibility to disease—the incidence is approximately 40 times higher in Finland than in Japan. Family studies also demonstrate a strong underlying genetic component. The lifetime risk of developing type 1 diabetes in the United States general population is 0.4%, whereas in relatives of diabetics the risk is substantially higher (4% for parents, 5%-7% for siblings, 20% for HLA-identical siblings, 25%-40% for monozygotic twins).

The inheritance pattern of autoimmune disorders is complex. These disorders are polygenic, arising from several independently segregating genes. The most consistent genetic marker for autoimmune diseases to date is the MHC genotype. Considering again genetic susceptibility to type 1 diabetes, up to 95% of Caucasians developing diabetes express the HLA alleles DR3 or DR4—compared to about 40% of normal individuals. Individuals heterozygous for both DR3 and DR4 have the highest risk. It has been shown that the DQ rather than DR genotype is a more specific marker of susceptibility and that the association of both markers is due to the fact that they are products of closely linked genes. But what is more important than the fact that HLA genes are linked to diabetes is that HLA haplotypes are no longer simply undefined genetic markers. It has been shown that the polymorphisms of the DQ molecules are critical for high-affinity recognition of autoantigens (eg, islet cell antigens) by TCRs. HLA-DQ structure analysis suggests that the lack of aspartic acid at position 57 (Asp57) on the DQ β chain allows the autoantigen (processed peptide) to fit better in the antigen-binding groove formed by this molecule. To the contrary, the presence of Asp57 allows the formation of a salt bridge with a conserved arginine at position 76 on the DQ α chain, preventing the accommodation of the immunogenic peptide recognized by the TCR. Several autoimmune diseases have been linked to HLA-DQβ1 genes, including type 1 diabetes, celiac disease, bullous pemphigoid, autoimmune hepatitis, and premature ovarian failure, and the structure of the DQβ1 molecule may be the reason for the increased susceptibility. Other candidate genes associated with autoimmune endocrinopathies are discussed further under the single and polyglandular syndromes.

Environmental factors also play a critical role in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disease. The strongest evidence for this statement comes from studies of monozygotic twins, which show that concordance rates for autoimmune disorders are imperfect (never 100%). As mentioned above, in type 1 diabetes, identical twins show less than 50% concordance.

The environmental factors thought to have greatest influence on disease development include infectious agents, diet, and toxins. In type 1 diabetes, viruses have been strong suspects. Up to 20% of children prenatally infected with rubella develop type 1 diabetes. Children with congenital rubella also have an increased incidence of other autoimmune disorders, including thyroiditis and dysgammaglobulinemia. The mechanisms by which these pathogens may induce autoimmune responses include molecular mimicry and direct tissue injury. The hypothesis of molecular mimicry suggests that immune responses directed at infectious agents can cross-react with self antigens, causing tissue or organ destruction. Support for this concept is found in well-known clinical syndromes such as rheumatic fever (immune responses directed against streptococcal M protein seem to cross-react with cardiac myosin, inducing clinical myocarditis). In autoimmune diabetes, the best-studied example of molecular mimicry is the B4 coxsackievirus protein P2-C. Coxsackie B4 virus has also been epidemiologically implicated in the development of type 1 diabetes. There is a striking amino acid sequence similarity between P2-C viral protein and the enzyme glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD), found in pancreatic β cells (see Autoimmune Aspects of Type 1 Diabetes, discussed later).

The importance of diet in the development of autoimmune diseases remains controversial. An association between early exposure to cow's milk proteins and the risk of type 1 diabetes has been observed in several epidemiologic studies. For example, one study demonstrated that primary immunity to insulin is induced in infancy by oral exposure to cow's milk insulin, but the relevance of this observation is still unknown. On the other hand, selected antigens (from bovine serum albumin to porcine insulin) have been administered orally to mice with a broad spectrum of autoimmune disorders, including nonobese diabetic (NOD) mice, with favorable outcomes. Those data in mice were so compelling that oral tolerance trials in humans have been conducted or are ongoing. Unfortunately, the results of already completed trials in other autoimmune diseases have been disappointing. Three large, randomized, controlled trials designed to delay or prevent type 1 diabetes—the two Diabetes Prevention Trial (DPT-1 and 2) and the European Diabetes Nicotinamide Intervention Trial—have failed to demonstrate a treatment effect. Thus, it should not be concluded that it is impossible to delay or prevent type 1 diabetes; rather, it may require testing of more potent interventions or combinations of therapies, guided by better understanding of the immunopathogenesis of the disease, to demonstrate attenuation or amelioration of the destructive immune process leading to type 1 diabetes.

Organ-specific autoimmune endocrine disorders may present as single entities or may cluster in polyglandular syndromes. Most endocrine glands are susceptible to autoimmune attack. Some are affected more frequently than others (see Table 2–1).

Autoimmune thyroid disease can present in a polarized fashion with Graves disease (thyroid hyperfunction) at one end and Hashimoto thyroiditis (thyroid failure) at the other. This functional subdivision is clinically useful. However, both diseases have a common autoimmune origin.

Genes and Environment

Major susceptibility genes in autoimmune thyroid disease have yet to be identified. Although certain HLA alleles (mainly HLA-DR3 and DQA1*0501) have been shown to be present more frequently in Graves disease than in the general population, this association has frequently been challenged. In fact, no consistent association has been found between Graves disease and any known HLA polymorphism. Furthermore, the risk of developing Graves disease in HLA-identical siblings (7%) is not significantly different from that in control populations. HLA-DR5, -DR3, -DQw7 in Caucasian, HLA-DRw53 in Japanese, and HLA-DR9 in Chinese patients were found to be associated with Hashimoto thyroiditis. However, genetic linkage between Hashimoto thyroiditis and a specific HLA locus has not been demonstrated consistently. Overall, the HLA loci are likely to provide less than 5% of the genetic contribution to autoimmune thyroid disease, confirming the relative importance of non-HLA-related genes in susceptibility. For example, it has been shown that the inheritance pattern of autoantibodies to thyroperoxidase (TPO) is genetically transmitted. Other candidates are currently under study. However, autoimmune thyroid disease linkage to CTLA-4, HLA, IgH chain, TCR, thyroglobulin (Tg), TPO, and thyrotropin receptor (TSH-R) genes has been excluded. Recently, using positional genetics of a candidate gene, Graves disease susceptibility was mapped to a noncoding 6.13 kb 3′ region of CTLA-4, the common allelic variation of which was correlated with lower messenger RNA levels of the soluble alternatively spliced form of CTLA-4 (sCTLA-4). sCTLA-4 is known to be present in human serum. It can bind CD80/86 molecules on APCs and inhibit T-cell proliferation in vitro. The reduction in the level of sCTLA-4 could potentially lead to reduced blocking of CD80/86, causing increased activation through CD28 of autoreactive T cells.

An important environmental factor influencing the natural history of autoimmune thyroid disease is that of iodine intake (dietary, or present in drugs such as amiodarone or in x-ray contrast media). There is considerable evidence that iodine adversely affects both thyroid function and antibody production in those with occult or overt autoimmune thyroid disease.

Autoimmune Response

In Graves disease, thyrocytes are the differentiated carriers of TSH-Rs and the target cells of autoantibodies and probably the autoimmune response. The development of autoantibodies that functionally stimulate the TSH-R mimicking the action of TSH was the first example of antibody-mediated activities of a hormone receptor in humans. Autoantibodies that may stimulate the calcium-sensing receptor (CaSR) (another G-protein–coupled receptor) and signal the inhibition of PTH production have been described in autoimmune hypoparathyroidism. Similarly, stimulating antibodies that bind to the adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) receptor may be involved in the pathogenesis of primary pigmented nodular adrenocortical disease (also referred to as nodular adrenal dysplasia).

In Graves disease, antibodies to the TSH-R present with different types of activity. Thyroid-stimulating immunoglobulins (TSIs), the cause of the hyperthyroidism, are detected by a bioassay that measures cAMP production in a cell line that expresses TSH-Rs. TSH-R autoantibodies (stimulating, blocking, or neutral) can be identified by their ability to prevent TSH binding to the TSH-R (TSH-binding inhibition immunoglobulins, TBII). No direct immunoassay for the measurement of TSH-R autoantibodies is available yet, and its development may be difficult because TSH-R autoantibodies are present at very low concentrations in patients with the disease.

A particular feature of Graves disease is its early clinical presentation. Unlike other autoimmune endocrinopathies (type 1 diabetes, Hashimoto thyroiditis, autoimmune Addison disease), in which much of the target organ has to be destroyed before the disease is manifested, Graves hyperthyroidism often presents with an enlarged and active gland. Minimal lymphocytic infiltration is present when hyperthyroidism (due to the presence of TSH-R-stimulating antibodies) develops. This unique feature may ultimately allow early immune intervention in preference to current ablative therapeutic options.

Another peculiar feature of Graves disease is the helper T-cell response observed in this disease. The activation of antibody-producing B cells by TH lymphocytes in Graves disease is well recognized. At present, a prevailing concept of human autoimmunity suggests that as in acute allograft rejection, “deviation” toward a TH1 response dominates its pathogenesis. Counterdeviation toward TH2 is thought to be a consequence of tolerance induction and has been postulated as a potential therapeutic approach. Graves disease seems to challenge that concept. Analysis of TSH-R-specific T-cell clones from patients with Graves disease has provided direct evidence for polarization of TH responses; however, instead of TH1 deviation, TH0 and TH2 responses have been observed. As mentioned before, TH1 cells, which regulate cell-mediated responses, secrete mainly IFN-γ and small amounts of IL-4. In contrast, TH2 cells that regulate antibody production (such as TSH-R autoantibodies in Graves disease) preferentially produce IL-4 and little IFN-γ. T cells expressing both IL-4 and IFN-γ are known as TH0 cells. These experimental results suggest that in Graves disease TH0 to TH2 cell responses appear to be dominant. Hence, in human autoimmunity, Graves disease appears to be an exception to the usual TH cell pattern.

In Hashimoto thyroiditis, the hallmark of the humoral immune response is the presence of autoantibodies to TPO. Although the effector mechanism for TPO (or thyroglobulin [Tg]) autoantibodies is still controversial, under special circumstances (at least in vitro) the autoantibodies are themselves cytotoxic agents or activators of cytotoxic T lymphocytes. Furthermore, in secondary T-cell responses, antibodies may play a critical role in antigen processing or presentation to T cells. In short, macrophages internalize (and subsequently process) antigen by phagocytosis and antigen-antibody complex uptake via Fc receptors. B cells have membrane-bound antibodies (B-cell receptors; BCRs) which provide a much more powerful system for antigen capture. Indeed, recombinant TPO-specific membrane-bound autoantibody captures antigen and allows presentation efficiently. Antibody binding also modulates antigen processing of immune complexes, enhancing or suppressing the presentation of different T-cell peptides. Hence, APCs (internalizing immune complexes through Fc receptors) and B cells (capturing antigen through BCRs) can influence the secondary T-cell response that perpetuates autoimmune disease. The potential role of autoantibodies in modulating presentation of T-cell determinants in thyroid (and diabetes) autoimmunity is being explored.

Animal Models of Autoimmune Thyroid Disease

The classic immunologic approach to development of an animal model of an autoimmune disease is to immunize the animal with soluble antigen in adjuvant. For autoimmune thyroid disease, the induction of thyroiditis in rabbits using human Tg was one of the earliest attempts to do this—by Rose and coworkers in 1956. In subsequent studies, mice immunized with human or murine Tg developed experimental autoimmune thyroiditis. Immunization with TPO (human or porcine) induces thyroid autoantibodies and, as in the case of Tg, causes thyroiditis to develop in particular MHC strains of mice. However, unlike spontaneous thyroiditis in chickens, none of the immunized mouse models of thyroiditis develop hypothyroidism.

In 1996, Shimojo and coworkers developed a mouse model that clearly mimics some of the major features of Graves disease. This was achieved by the ingenious approach of immunizing mice with fibroblasts stably transfected with the cDNA for the human TSH-R and syngeneic MHC class II (Figure 2–7). Most of the animals had moderately high TBII activity in their sera, and about 25% were clearly thyrotoxic, with elevated T4 and T3 values, detectable TSI activity, and thyroid hypertrophy. For the first time, therefore, an animal model was established in which a significant number of affected subjects have the immunologic and endocrinologic features of Graves hyperthyroidism. More recently, other models have become available. The general rule for induction of an antibody response to the TSH-R in the form of TSI and consequent Graves disease appears to be the need to express the antigen in a native form in an MHC class II carrying cell. Thus, TSH-R-transfected B cells (M12 cell line), TSH-R-adenovirus-infected dendritic cells, and even naked TSH-R DNA or TSH-R adenovirus parenterally delivered and probably captured and expressed by MHC class II expressing cells, have been used to induce TSI and Graves-like disease. However, the focal thyroiditis that accompanies human Graves, as well as the extrathyroidal manifestations that define the disease, have never been reliably reproduced in any of these models. Nevertheless, these models open up new ways of investigating the pathogenesis of Graves disease.

Most type 1 diabetes results from autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β cells in a process that can span several years. This results in glucose intolerance and clinical disease when the majority of β cells have been destroyed. The destruction is marked by circulating antibodies to pancreatic β cells and by massive infiltration of mononuclear lymphocytes into the islets of Langerhans while pancreatic β cells remain. The lymphocytes disappear when the β cells are gone. Although insulin is available for replacement therapy, type 1 diabetes remains a chronic disorder of major socioeconomic impact, especially because it mainly afflicts the young. Elucidation of the molecular mechanisms underlying this destruction—and the development of methods to prevent autoimmunity—may ultimately lead to effective treatment. Such developments, however, require animal models of type 1 diabetes that closely resemble the disease in humans.

Genes and Environment

The susceptibility to develop type 1 diabetes is associated with certain alleles of the MHC class II locus that have been statistically linked to a variety of autoimmune disorders. The most recent analyses indicate that in Caucasians, HLA-DR3, DQ2 (DQB1*0201) and HLA-DR4 (DRB1*0401), DQ8 (DQB1*0302) haplotypes are most strongly associated with type 1 diabetes. In Asian populations, DRB1*0405 is the major susceptibility haplotype. In contrast, the DR2, DQ6 (DQB1*0602) haplotype is negatively associated with type 1 diabetes. More importantly, susceptibility requires both HLA-DQ β chain alleles to be negative for aspartic acid at position 57 (Asp57) in the amino acid sequence. Studies of different populations have shown a linear relationship between the incidence of type 1 diabetes and the estimated frequency of homozygous absence of Asp57.

Non-HLA candidate genes consistently associated with type 1 diabetes include the “variable number of tandem repeats” (VNTR) polymorphisms in the insulin gene and the CTLA-4 gene (CD152). The VNTR polymorphisms are located adjacent to defined regulatory sequences that influence insulin gene expression. Of immunologic importance, CTLA-4 gene (see Immune Recognition and Response, discussed earlier) is the other non-HLA candidate gene consistently found to be associated with type 1 diabetes.

Although environmental factors definitely play a role in the development of type 1 diabetes (eg, Coxsackie B4 virus, mumps virus, rubella virus, Kilham rat virus in the bio breeding [BB]-rat; or cow's milk formula exposure), more studies are needed to establish a definite etiologic link.

Autoimmune Response

The autoantibodies associated with β cell destruction can be present up to several years before the clinical onset of disease and are thus excellent markers of disease risk. Furthermore, they have served as important tools to identify human pancreatic β cell autoantigens. In 1990, Baekkeskov and coworkers identified a 64-kDa islet cell protein as the smaller isoform of the enzyme that synthesizes γ-aminobutyrate (GABA): glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65). This autoantigen was shown to be recognized by 70% to 80% of prediabetic and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients' sera. A second component of the 64-kDa antigen was shown to be a putative tyrosine phosphatase, termed IA-2. IA-2 is recognized by 60% to 70% of prediabetic and newly diagnosed type 1 diabetic patients. Together, GAD65 and IA-2 autoantibodies detect over 90% of individuals who develop type 1 diabetes and can be used to detect individuals at risk several years before the clinical onset of disease.

Although autoantibody responses to GAD65 are not easily detected, there is strong evidence to suggest that GAD65 is an important T-cell autoantigen in the NOD mouse. Thus, GAD65 is the earliest known target of the autoimmune T-cell response in the NOD mouse. Administration of the protein in a tolerogenic form prevents disease in NOD mice. In contrast, induction of tolerance to other potential autoantigens in this model (such as carboxypeptidase H and hsp60) does not prevent disease. The NOD mouse does not develop autoimmunity to the IA-2 molecule and thus distinguishes itself from the human disease with regard to this target antigen (see Models, discussed later).

Insulin is a third well-characterized autoantigen in type 1 diabetes. Insulin autoantibodies can be detected in about 50% of newly diagnosed children with type 1 diabetes. Insulin-specific T-cell clones can transfer disease in the NOD mouse. Furthermore, administration of whole insulin, insulin B chain, or an insulin peptide epitope in a tolerogenic form can protect against disease in NOD mice. Because animals receiving insulin or insulin B chain continue to have intra-islet insulitis—in contrast to young NOD mice treated with GAD65 in a tolerogenic way—it has been suggested that insulin reactivity is more distal in disease progression. Additional but less well-characterized proteins have been implicated as targets of autoantibodies in type 1 diabetes in humans.

Autoantibodies, although they are good markers of disease, do not seem to be directly involved in destruction of pancreatic β cells. Adoptive transfer of diabetes to NOD mice with spontaneous, combined immunodeficiency (NOD-SCID) lacking B cells, can be mediated by T cells alone. However, because β-cell-deficient NOD mice do not develop disease, it is possible that B lymphocytes function as important APCs in the islet to perpetuate an ongoing autoimmune response and thus are essential for presentation of rare antigens such as GAD65 and IA-2. (See also autoimmune response in the section on Autoimmune Aspects of Thyroid Disease, discussed earlier.)

An important question is whether GAD65, IA-2, and insulin are major target antigens of T-cell mediated β-cell destruction that results in type 1 diabetes in humans. Proliferative and cytotoxic T-cell responses to GAD65 are detected in the peripheral blood of newly diagnosed type 1 diabetes patients, but their pathogenicity has not been addressed. Induction of neonatal tolerance to GAD65 specifically prevents diabetes in the NOD mouse model. The role of IA-2 in destructive autoimmunity to the pancreatic β cell in humans is suggested by the high predictive value of IA-2 antibodies for clinical onset of diabetes.

Both GAD65 and IA-2 are neuroendocrine proteins, which are expressed at significant levels in the brain and β cell. Stiff-man syndrome—a very rare neurologic disorder in humans with a high coincidence of diabetes—is characterized by a strong autoantibody response to GAD65, the titer of which is several orders of magnitude higher than in diabetes. It has been suggested that impairment of GABA-secreting neurons in stiff-man syndrome is mediated by GAD65 autoantibodies, whereas development of type 1 diabetes is associated with a cellular immune response to GAD65. The low incidence of stiff-man syndrome compared with type 1 diabetes (only one in 104 type 1 diabetic patients develops stiff-man syndrome, whereas 40% of stiff-man syndrome patients develop type 1 diabetes) probably reflects in part the protection of GABAergic neurons by the blood–brain barrier and the absence of MHC class II antigen expression in normal neurons. The cellular localization of IA-2 expression in brain is not known, and there are no known disorders of the central nervous system that involve autoimmunity to IA-2.

In the NOD mouse, the destruction of pancreatic β cells requires both the CD4 T-helper (TH) cells and CD8 cytotoxic (TC) cells. Whereas TH cells seem to be required for the development of an autoimmune response to the islets and generation of intrainsulitis, TC cells are probably the effector cells of β-cell destruction. Furthermore, there is evidence that in the CD4 lineage, the TH1 subset is important for development of disease in the NOD mouse. TH1 cells are induced by IL-12 and are biased toward secreting IFN-γ and IL-2. In contrast, there is evidence that the TH2 cytokine IL-4 exerts a dominant-negative effect on diabetes progression in the NOD mouse. In humans, low autoantibody titers associated with type 1 diabetes and high titers associated with a protective haplotype (DR2) suggest that a strong TH2 response can be inhibitory for β-cell destruction. A role for TH1 cells in human disease is also suggested by results of cytokine profiles of peripheral human NK cells in identical twins which are discordant for the development of diabetes. This is different from the observed TH responses in Graves disease (see Autoimmune Aspects of Thyroid Disease, discussed earlier).

Recently, it has been suggested that it is not the presence of autoantibodies to GAD65 but the absence of the corresponding anti-idiotypic antibodies that defines type 1 diabetes. Anti-idiotypic antibodies bind to the idiotype (binding region) of other antibodies. Investigators found that while diabetes patients are positive for GAD65 antibodies because they lack certain anti-idiotypic antibodies, healthy individuals are negative for GAD65 antibodies because of the very presence of anti-idiotypic antibodies directed against GAD65 antibodies in their serum.

Animal Models of Autoimmune Diabetes Mellitus

The nonobese diabetic (NOD) mouse has been invaluable for studies of molecular mechanisms of autoimmunity directed toward the pancreatic β cells and the development of diabetes. It has several features, however, which distinguish it from the human disease. The incidence of diabetes is two to three times higher in female than in male NODs, whereas in humans there is a slight preponderance of type 1 diabetes in males. Furthermore, while the induction of organ-specific autoimmunity and inflammation in humans may be caused by human pathogens or toxins, autoimmunity seems to be the default mechanism in the NOD mouse. Thus, mice in clean, pathogen-free environments have a high incidence of disease, whereas a variety of regimens that stimulate the immune system of the mouse, such as viral infection or injection of complete Freund adjuvant, prevent disease. To date, more than 125 treatments for successful prevention or delay of diabetes in the NOD mouse have been identified, but none have been identified for humans.

The bio breeding (BB) rat develops spontaneous T-cell-mediated diabetes. The BB-rat disease is significantly different from the human disease in that it is accompanied by autoantibodies to lymphocytes and a severe lymphocytopenia, which is essential for development of β-cell autoimmunity and diabetes in this model.

In an attempt to develop better models of diabetes, “humanized” transgenic mice that express diabetes-prone human MHC class II molecules were developed. Since these animals did not develop spontaneous diabetes, they were backcrossed into the NOD background. However, backcrossing to NOD once again prevented the development of diabetes. Other animal models of type 1 diabetes, some of them carrying human MHC class II diabetes-susceptibility genes, were developed by expression of ectopic molecules in the islets using the rat insulin promoter (RIP). In some of these models, diabetes needed to be induced by immunization with, for example, insulin peptides or lymphocytic choriomeningitis virus. However, none of these models fully reflect the human disease in that the immune attack was initiated against target human β-cell autoantigen(s) in an MHC class II–restricted fashion, without the need for aberrant protein(s) (foreign to the pancreatic β-cell) expression.

Although some of the models of type 1 diabetes described have been very useful for studies of basic immunologic mechanisms associated with pancreatic β-cell autoimmunity, other models of type 1 diabetes closer to what occurs in humans are needed if immunoprevention and immunomodulatory techniques are to be tested. At a minimum, human susceptibility genes and human target antigens need to coexist in an animal model to mimic human autoimmune responses.

Autoimmune Adrenal Failure

Autoimmune Addison disease seldom develops as a single-gland syndrome. In about 50% of cases, the disease is associated with other gland and organ failure. Anderson and coworkers described the existence of adrenal-specific autoantibodies for the first time in 1963. Using immunofluorescence techniques on sections of human, bovine, or monkey adrenals, antibodies specifically recognizing the adrenal cortex (ACA) were described. Steroid-producing cell autoantibodies (SCA) reactive with cells of the adrenals, gonads, and placenta were described by Anderson and coworkers in 1968. SCAs are detected predominantly in ACA-positive patients with Addison disease who have premature ovarian failure in the context of autoimmune polyglandular syndrome type I (APS-I; see Autoimmune Polyglandular Syndromes, discussed later).

Steroid 21-hydroxylase has been identified as a major adrenal autoantigen in ACA-positive patients with Addison disease. Using a sensitive assay based on the immune precipitation of radiolabeled recombinant 21-hydroxylase, workers in one study reported positive testing in sera from 72% of patients with isolated Addison disease, 92% of patients with APS-I, 100% of patients with APS-II, and 80% of patients who were positive for ACA by immunofluorescence but did not have clinically overt Addison disease (apparently healthy blood donors showed 2.5% positivity) (Table 2–2). Another study measured ACA in 808 children with organ-specific autoimmune diseases without adrenal insufficiency. ACAs were detectable in 14. Ten of these ACA-positive children (also positive for 21-hydroxylase antibodies) and 12 ACA-negative children were prospectively followed with adrenocortical function testing and antibodies. Overt Addison disease developed in 9 (90%) ACA/21-hydroxylase antibody-positive children within 3 to 121 months, and the one remaining child had subclinical hypoadrenalism throughout an extra 24-month observation period. The progression to adrenal failure was not related to ACA titer, sex, baseline adrenal function (subclinical insufficiency vs. normal function), type of associated autoimmune disease, or HLA status. Although ACA 21-hydroxylase antibodies appear to be highly predictive in children, in adults the cumulative risk of developing Addison disease in patients with other organ-specific autoimmune diseases and positive ACA 21-hydroxylase antibodies is about 32%. Steroid 17α-hydroxylase is another adrenal autoantigen. 17α-Hydroxylase antibodies were found in 5% of patients with isolated Addison disease, 55% of patients with APS-I, 33% of patients with APS-II, and 20% of sera from patients who were positive for ACA but did not have clinically overt Addison disease (see Table 2–2). Antibodies against another adrenal autoantigen, cytochrome P450 side-chain cleavage enzyme (P450scc), were found to be present in 9% of patients with isolated Addison disease, 45% of patients with APS-I, 36% of patients with APS-II, and 20% of sera from patients who were positive for ACA but did not have clinically overt Addison disease (see Table 2–2). The prevalence of P450scc antibodies in these groups of patients was always lower than that of 21-hydroxylase antibodies but similar to that of 17α-hydroxylase antibodies. Furthermore, almost all sera that were positive for 17α-hydroxylase or P450scc antibodies were also positive for 21-hydroxylase antibodies. In addition, a comparison of SCAs measured by immunofluorescence with 17α-hydroxylase and P450scc antibody measurements suggested that 17α-hydroxylase and P450scc are the major components of the SCA antigen just as 21-hydroxylase is the major component of ACA antigen.

Overall, immune responses in autoimmune adrenal disease may involve other antigens, but reactivity to the three described, particularly 21-hydroxylase, appears to predominate. Although inhibition of enzymatic activity by these antibodies has been shown in vitro, no clear relationship to the pathogenesis of the clinical syndrome has yet been established.

Autoimmune Oophoritis and Orchitis

An autoimmune origin for premature ovarian failure with concomitant Addison disease or oophoritis can be based on the following human and animal data: (1) the presence of autoantibodies to SCA in most cases, (2) the characterization of shared autoantigens between the adrenals and the ovaries (ie, 17α-hydroxylase and P450scc), (3) the histologic features of the ovaries (lymphocyte and plasma cell infiltrate involving steroid-producing cells), and (4) animal models of the syndrome. There is some evidence of autoimmunity in idiopathic premature ovarian failure not associated with Addison disease (cellular immune abnormalities, presence of various ovarian antibodies in some patients, and associations with type 1 diabetes and myasthenia gravis); however, the absence of histologic confirmation makes the autoimmune pathogenesis less credible.

Less is known about the autoimmune pathogenesis of human orchitis. Animal models, however, have shown that infectious or traumatic injury to the testes can induce autoimmune responses in this immune-privileged tissue (defined as sites where antigens are not presented to the host immune system; see Tolerance, discussed earlier).

Autoimmune Hypophysitis

Autoimmune hypophysitis (also called lymphocytic hypophysitis) should be considered in the differential diagnosis of pituitary abnormalities in women (8:1 female:male ratio) during the latter half of pregnancy and in the first 6 months postpartum, as well as in patients with coexisting autoimmune disorders, for example, thyroiditis, adrenalitis, autoimmune hypoparathyroidism, or atrophic gastritis. More than 380 cases have been described since the original report in 1962. Antipituitary antibodies have been detected in a minority of patients. Owing to the lack of markers for the disease, the diagnosis can only be confirmed with histologic examination. Nevertheless, because of the usually transient endocrine and compressive features of this condition, conservative management based on clinical suspicion may prevent the consequences of unnecessary pituitary surgery. Granulomatous hypophysitis—another form of autoimmune hypophysitis—appears to have a similar autoimmune pathogenesis but more commonly affects postmenopausal women and men. The presence of regulatory T cells in this form of hypophysitis, however, makes the autoimmune pathogenesis less clear.

Autoimmune Hypoparathyroidism

Autoimmune hypoparathyroidism, also called idiopathic hypoparathyroidism, is one of the major components of APS type I (APS-I; see next section). It also presents as a sporadic disease, sometimes associated with Hashimoto thyroiditis in women. The fact that autoimmune hypoparathyroidism presents in association with other autoimmune diseases and also the presence of autoantibodies reactive with parathyroid tissue in many affected patients suggests an autoimmune pathogenesis. Parathyroid autoantibodies have been reported to show a complement-dependent cytotoxic effect on cultured bovine parathyroid cells. At least one major parathyroid autoantigen has been identified as the CaSR. The CaSR is of great importance in the regulation of parathyroid hormone secretion and renal tubular calcium reabsorption. This receptor is a member of the 7-membrane-spanning domain G protein–coupled receptor family. It is also expressed in thyroid C cells, the pituitary, the hypothalamus, and in other regions of the brain. The relationship of the autoimmune response directed against the receptor to the pathogenesis of the disease is not clear. However, antibody-mediated stimulation of the CaSR with consequent inhibition of PTH synthesis and secretion has been suggested. The prevalence of the CaSR antibodies in clinically diagnosed idiopathic hypoparathyroidism was found to be 56% in one study. Measurement of these antibodies may have value in predicting the development of autoimmune hypoparathyroidism in patients with autoimmune endocrinopathies who are at risk. Furthermore, hypercalcemia in a patient with multiple autoimmune disorders, responsive to glucocorticoids, has been recently described as secondary to the presence of a blocking IgG4 autoantibody directed against the CaSR and apparently capable of blocking the inhibitory actions of the ligand calcium (see also Chapter 8).

Associations of multiple autoimmune endocrine disorders have been classified in different syndromes. APS type I and type II (APS-I and -II) can be clearly separated clinically (Table 2–3). Some authors have attempted to subdivide APS-II (ie, APS-II and -III) on the basis of the association of some autoimmune disorders but not others. Little information is gained, however, by making this subdivision in terms of understanding pathogenesis or prevention of future endocrine failure in patients or their relatives. Other autoimmune associations, not always described in syndromes, are also classically recognized. Vitiligo, for example, seems to accompany multiple autoimmune endocrinopathies. There is now convincing evidence of linkage between NALP1 (NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 1), a gene involved in immune regulation, and the presence of vitiligo associated with at least one endocrine autoimmune disease including but not limited to type 1 diabetes, Addison disease, and thyroiditis.

APS-I is an autosomal recessive disorder with 25% incidence among siblings of affected individuals. Also known as APECED, or autoimmune polyendocrinopathy-candidiasis-ectodermal dystrophy, APS-I is characterized by the triad of chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis, autoimmune hypoparathyroidism, and adrenal insufficiency (only two are required in the index case for the diagnosis, and only one in the siblings). Chronic mucocutaneous candidiasis (involving oral mucosa and nails or, less frequently, the esophagus) is usually first manifested as the initial problem early in life. In most individuals, the development of autoimmune hypoparathyroidism, a major clinical phenotype, usually follows. Specifically for hypoparathyroidism, the presence of antibodies to NALP5 (NACHT leucine-rich-repeat protein 5), a gene highly expressed in parathyroid and ovary, have been recently described. In one study these antibodies were detected in 49% of patients with known APS-I and hypothyroidism (see also Chapter 8). Addison disease is another component of the triad that can manifest prior to, concomitantly with, or following hypoparathyroidism. Lifelong surveillance is important since decades may elapse between the development of one feature of the disorder and the onset of another. There is no female preponderance in this syndrome, and it is not HLA-associated. APS-I may occur sporadically or in families. The genetic locus responsible for the disease has been mapped to the long arm of chromosome 21 (21q22.3). The haplotype analysis of this region in different populations has shown that APS-I is linked to different mutations in a gene identified as the autoimmune regulator (AIRE). AIRE encodes a putative nuclear protein with transcription factor motifs (including two zinc finger motifs). It is expressed in different tissues but particularly in the thymus. The mechanism by which mutations of this putative transcription factor lead to the diverse manifestations of APS-I is still unknown. In mice, however, the absence of the analogous protein “aire” influences ectopic expression of peripheral tissue antigens in thymic medullary epithelial cells (MECs), resulting in the development of an autoimmune disorder similar to APS-I and establishing aire/AIRE as an important factor in the induction of central tolerance. Other immune response-related genes as well as environmental factors probably play a role in development of the syndrome. Several studies of large cohorts of patients from different ethnic backgrounds have reported the appearance of chronic candidiasis at different sites in all patients. Hypoparathyroidism and Addison disease present with similar high frequency (see Table 2–3). The occurrence of the diagnostic triad reportedly presents in 57% of patients. Female hypogonadism, presenting as total or partial failure of pubertal development or as premature ovarian failure in adults, has been reported in up to 60% of patients. Male hypogonadism is less frequent (14%). Type 1 diabetes is not as frequent as in APS-II, but if present, usually develops early (under 21 years of age). Autoimmune hypothyroidism (atrophic thyroiditis) is also less frequent than in APS-II; however, thyroid autoantibodies may be present in many euthyroid patients. Other manifestations are described in Table 2–3. Acute autoimmune hepatitis is reportedly less common than chronic hepatitis, which appears to be present in most individuals. Autoantibodies to aromatic L-amino acid decarboxylase (AADC) are associated with chronic active autoimmune hepatitis and vitiligo, which are found in APS-I. These antibodies, if present, can be helpful in making the diagnosis. Autoantibodies against tryptophan hydroxylase have been associated with gastrointestinal dysfunction in APS-I. Autoantibodies to the H+-K+-ATPase and to intrinsic factor are associated with pernicious anemia, and autoantibodies to tyrosinase are associated with vitiligo. Other autoantibodies associated with the single gland disorders that make up this polyglandular syndrome have been discussed above.

APS-II is the most common of the polyglandular failure syndromes. It affects women in a 3:1 ratio to men. APS-II is diagnosed when at least two of the following are present: adrenal insufficiency, autoimmune thyroid disease (thyroiditis with hypothyroidism or Graves disease with hyperthyroidism), and type 1 diabetes. Historically, Schmidt (1926) first described the association of Addison disease and thyroiditis. Carpenter and coworkers in 1964 included type 1 diabetes in the syndrome. Other components of APS-II include the following (see Table 2–3): primary hypogonadism, myasthenia gravis, celiac disease, pernicious anemia, alopecia, vitiligo, and serositis. The most frequent association appears to be with type 1 diabetes (over 50%) and autoimmune thyroid disease (70% in some series). Adrenal insufficiency may be concurrent, may be delayed in onset for up to two decades, or may never manifest. Some diabetic patients (2%-3%) develop celiac disease. Gluten-free diet is usually effective. If the celiac disease is untreated, hypocalcemia (not due to hypoparathyroidism), osteopenia, and occasionally gastrointestinal lymphoma may occur.

Although this syndrome and its components aggregate in families, there is no identifiable pattern of inheritance. Susceptibility is probably determined by multiple gene loci (HLA being the strongest) that interact with environmental factors. Many of the disorders of APS-II are associated (some genetically linked) with the HLA haplotype identified in single organ disorders. HLA-A1, -B8, -DR3 and -DR4, DQA1*0501, and DQB1*0201 have all been described as associated with APS-II.

Hormonal replacement therapy remains the only form of treatment of the APS. The clinical management of these disorders mandates early diagnosis of associated components. Since the age at onset of associated disorders is clinically unpredictable, long-term follow-up is needed. Endocrine disorders are treated as they develop and are diagnosed. Hormonal treatments for the specific gland failures are described elsewhere in this book. However, specific combinations of endocrine organ failure require specific management. For example, thyroxine replacement can precipitate life-threatening adrenal failure in a patient with untreated Addison disease. Furthermore, hypoglycemia or decreasing insulin requirements in a patient with type 1 diabetes may be the earliest symptom/sign of adrenal insufficiency. Hypocalcemia, seen in APS-II, is more commonly due to celiac disease than hypoparathyroidism. Treatment of mucocutaneous candidiasis with ketoconazole in patients with APS-I may induce adrenal insufficiency in a failing gland (ketoconazole is a global P450 cytochrome inhibitor). These antifungal drugs may also elevate liver enzymes, making the diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis—requiring treatment with immunosuppressants—more difficult in these patients.

Screening of affected individuals as well as their relatives is the only way of preventing morbidity and mortality. Annual measurement of TSH is recommended as cost-effective in first-degree relatives of patients with type 1 diabetes. Autoantibody measurements may help in the preclinical assessment of several disorders. Complete blood counts, electrolytes, calcium and phosphorus levels, thyroid and liver function tests, blood smears (including RBC indices), and vitamin B12/plasma methylmalonic acid measurements are all recommended in the follow-up of APS-I. For APS-II patients with type 1 diabetes, thyroid disease and celiac disease coexist with sufficient frequency to justify not only TSH measurement but also screening for endomysial antibodies containing transglutaminase antibodies, which are prevalent in celiac disease.

Another autoimmune polyglandular failure syndrome, immunodeficiency, polyendocrinopathy, and enteropathy, x-linked (IPEX) syndrome, is characterized by development of overwhelming systemic autoimmunity in the first year of life resulting in the observed triad of watery diarrhea, eczematous dermatitis, and endocrinopathy seen most commonly as type 1 diabetes mellitus. Most children have other autoimmune phenomena including Coombs positive anemia, autoimmune thrombocytopenia, autoimmune neutropenia, and tubular nephropathy. The majority of affected males die within the first year of life of either metabolic derangements or sepsis; a few survive into the second or third decade.

Diagnosis is based on clinical findings. FOXP3 is the only gene currently known to be associated with IPEX syndrome. Approximately 50% of males with IPEX syndrome have mutations identified in FOXP3. Genetic testing is clinically available. FOXP3 is expressed primarily in lymphoid tissues (thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes), particularly in CD4+ CD25+ regulatory T lymphocytes. In mice, it is required for the development and suppressive function of this important regulatory T-cell population. In humans, it is not expressed at baseline in CD4+ CD25− or CD8+ T cells but is expressed upon T-cell activation. The FOXP3 protein is absent (due to nonsense, frameshift, or splicing mutations) in individuals with severe, early-onset IPEX syndrome. Some individuals with FOXP3 point mutations express a protein that appears to have decreased function, thereby leading to a milder form of the disease. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from individuals with IPEX syndrome show an excess production of the Th2 cytokines IL-4, IL-5, IL-10, and IL-13 and decreased production of the Th1 cytokine IFN-γ.

Treatment options include: immunosuppressive agents (eg, cyclosporin A, tacrolimus) alone or in combination with steroids; sirolimus (rapamycin) for persons in whom tacrolimus therapy is toxic or ineffective; granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF, filgrastim) for autoimmune neutropenia; nutritional support; and standard treatment of diabetes mellitus and autoimmune thyroid disease. If performed early, bone marrow transplantation (BMT) using nonmyeloablative conditioning regimens can resolve clinical symptoms. If the family-specific mutation is known, FOXP3 sequence analysis in at-risk males can be undertaken immediately after birth to permit early diagnosis and BMT before significant organ damage occurs; otherwise, monitoring at-risk males for symptoms is needed to enable early diagnosis and treatment.

IPEX syndrome is inherited in an x-linked manner. The risk to siblings of the proband depends on the carrier status of the mother. If the mother of the proband is a carrier, the chance of transmitting the disease-causing mutation in each pregnancy is 50%. Males who inherit the mutation will be affected; females who inherit the mutation are carriers and will not be affected. Affected males pass the disease-causing mutation to all of their daughters and none of their sons. Prenatal testing for pregnancies at risk is possible for families in which the disease-causing mutation has been identified.

The POEMS (polyneuropathy, organomegaly, endocrinopathy, M spike, skin abnormalities) syndrome, which is frequently seen as a concomitant of Castelman disease (giant cell lymph node hyperplasia), includes a variety of endocrinopathies of the adrenal, thyroid, pituitary, gonads, parathyroids, and pancreas.

The POEMS syndrome displays a number of endocrinopathies in the setting of lymphoproliferative disorders and presumed B-cell dysfunction. Aside from one report in which 2 of 11 patients with monoclonal gammopathy and some form of autoimmunity had POEMS, the endocrinological manifestations of POEMS are not yet established as autoimmune in origin. When associated with Castleman, Kaposi-associated herpes virus (HHV8) may be implicated in the pathogenesis of the lymphoproliferation and the gammopathy.

Two-thirds of patients with POEMS reportedly had at least one endocrine abnormality at presentation. During the course of disease, endocrine abnormalities developed in another 10% of patients with POEMS. Hypogonadism seems to be the most common endocrine abnormality. Elevated levels of follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) in the absence of primary hypogonadism have been reported. One-third of patients reportedly have erectile dysfunction with low serum testosterone levels. Fourteen percent of patients have hypothyroidism requiring therapy. An additional 12% had mild increases in TSH levels but normal thyroxine levels in one series. Sixteen percent of patients with POEMS have abnormalities of the adrenal-pituitary axis at presentation; with 5% of patients developing adrenal insufficiency later in the course of their disease. Three percent of patients have diabetes mellitus. Serum levels of parathyroid hormone were increased in three of four patients in whom it was measured in one series of 99 POEMS patients. Finally and although still hypothetical for POEMS, autoantibody-mediated mechanisms of disease (Graves disease) have been described in patients with other gammopathies.