++
CASE 18: LIVER TRANSPLANTATION
A 61-year-old man underwent orthotopic liver transplantation for cirrhosis caused by chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). He acquired HCV from a transfusion of blood during coronary bypass surgery 10 years prior to his presentation with liver disease. Liver disease was diagnosed 2 years prior to orthotopic liver transplantation when he developed esophageal variceal bleeding. The bleeding was ultimately controlled, but the patient subsequently developed ascites and hepatic encephalopathy, only modestly controlled with medical therapy. He also suffered from insulin-dependent diabetes. At the time of his initial evaluation 4 months before the transplant, his liver function tests showed an AST of 43 units/L (normal, 10–40 units/L), ALT of 42 units/L (normal, 36–122 units/L), bilirubin of 2.9 mg/dL (normal, 0.1–1.2 mg/dL), albumin of 2.6 g/dL (normal 3.4–5 g/dL), and a prolonged prothrombin time of 1.8 international normalized ratio (INR). Anti-HCV was positive by the enzyme-linked immunoassay. The HCV genotype was type 1. The patient did not respond to interferon-α plus ribavirin therapy after 12 months. Viral load measurements were high at 500,000 IU/mL.
++
Orthotopic liver transplantation was accomplished without difficulty. Biliary reconstruction was by choledochocholedochostomy (primary anastomosis of the donor’s to the recipient’s common bile duct) with placement of a T-tube for external drainage of bile during healing of the anastomosis. A hepatocellular carcinoma was found incidentally on examination of the explant. The patient was started on intravenous tacrolimus (to reduce rejection) as a continuous infusion over 24 hours and corticosteroids for immunosuppression (also to help prevent rejection). The tacrolimus was changed to oral therapy on day 2. Intravenous ganciclovir was given on days 1–7 for prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection (hepatitis and pneumonia); after the ganciclovir was stopped, high-dose oral acyclovir was given four times daily for 3 months as continued prophylaxis against cytomegalovirus infection. Oral trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole also was given twice weekly as prophylaxis against pneumocystis pneumonia.
++
Allograft function was established immediately after transplantation. On day 7 the AST was 40 units/L, alkaline phosphatase 138 units/L (normal, 36–122 units/L), and bilirubin 6.2 mg/dL. The differential diagnosis of the abnormal liver function was injury during liver preservation between donation and transplantation, hepatic artery thrombosis, and, rarely, herpes simplex hepatitis. Liver biopsy on day 7 showed injury during preservation.
++
The patient was discharged on day 12 on oral tacrolimus and prednisone to help prevent rejection. On day 21, a liver biopsy showed no evidence of cellular rejection and the liver tests were excellent: AST 18 units/L, alkaline phosphatase 96 units/L, and bilirubin 2 mg/dL. The serum creatinine was 2.2 mg/dL (normal, 0.5–1.4 mg/dL), and the dose of oral tacrolimus was decreased. On day 28, liver function tests rose to AST 296 units/L, alkaline phosphatase 497 units/L, and bilirubin 7 mg/dL. The differential diagnosis of abnormal liver function was acute cellular rejection and biliary obstruction. Cytomegalovirus hepatitis was possible, but this generally occurs after day 35, and the patient had been receiving prophylaxis for cytomegalovirus. A liver biopsy showed acute cellular rejection.
++
The patient was treated with two intravenous doses of methylprednisolone followed by oral prednisone. The tacrolimus blood level was in the therapeutic range. A follow-up liver biopsy 2 weeks later showed mild fatty change but no rejection. The AST was 15 units/L, alkaline phosphatase 245 units/L, and bilirubin 1.6 mg/dL.
++
One month later, 2.5 months post-transplantation, the AST again rose to 155 units/L, but the alkaline phosphatase was unchanged at 178 units/L. Biopsy showed moderate fatty change, lobular hepatocyte necrosis, and mild portal inflammation consistent with post-transplant hepatitis C infection or resolving rejection. A polymerase chain reaction assay for HCV RNA was not done because it would have been positive and would have had limited prognostic value. The clinical impression was recurrent hepatitis C. The tacrolimus and prednisone were continued. Over the next month, liver function tests returned to normal.
++
At 6 months post-transplantation, the T-tube was removed from the bile drainage system. The patient immediately experienced severe diffuse abdominal pain. Culture of the bile grew E coli and vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium. The clinical impression was bile drainage into the abdomen. The patient was treated with ceftriaxone and linezolid. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) with sphincterotomy was performed to improve the bile flow. The patient was discharged 2 days later.
++
Eight months after the transplant, the patient presented with generalized subcutaneous edema (anasarca) and a lower extremity rash. His liver tests were mildly abnormal. The hematocrit and white blood cell count were normal. The blood urea nitrogen was 54 mg/dL (normal, 10–24 mg/dL), and serum creatinine was 2.8 mg/dL (normal, 0.6–1.2 mg/dL). Urinalysis showed 4+ protein and more than 50 red blood cells per high-power field. Skin biopsy showed a leukocytoclastic vasculitis. Cryoglobulinemia was diagnosed.
++
Four years post-transplant, the patient’s liver tests have remained normal with the exception of intermittent mild AST and ALT elevations. Follow-up liver biopsies have shown moderate to severe fatty change with mild mononuclear cell portal inflammation. The patient remains an insulin-dependent diabetic. Renal function is mildly abnormal, with a serum creatinine of about 1.4 mg/dL. His quality of life is good. He is currently maintained on tacrolimus and prednisone. Compared with other liver transplant recipients, the patient is at increased risk for developing cirrhosis and suffering graft loss.
++
Transplant patients have their most important and life-threatening infections during the first few months following transplantation. Factors present prior to the transplant may be important. Underlying disease may contribute to susceptibility to infection. The patient may not have specific immunity (eg, may never have been exposed to cytomegalovirus) but the transplanted organ may be from a cytomegalovirus-positive donor or a blood transfusion may transmit the virus. The patient may have a latent infection that can become active during the period of immunosuppression following transplantation; examples include infections with herpes simplex virus, varicella-zoster virus, cytomegalovirus, and others, including tuberculosis. The patient may have received immunosuppressive drugs prior to transplantation.
++
A major factor determining infection is the type of transplantation: liver, heart, lung, kidney, and so on. The duration and complexity of the surgical procedure also are important. Infections tend to involve the transplanted organ or to occur in association with the organ. In liver transplant patients, the surgery is complex and can take many hours. The type of biliary drainage that is established is an important determinant of abdominal infection. Direct connection of the donor biliary tract to the small bowel of the recipient (choledochojejunostomy) predisposes to biliary tract infection more so than does connection of the donor biliary tract to the recipient’s existing biliary tract (choledochocholedochostomy). Liver transplant patients with surgery lasting 5–10 hours average one episode of infection post-transplant, while those whose surgery takes over 25 hours average three episodes. Liver transplant patients are prone to development of cytomegalovirus hepatitis and pneumonia. Heart–lung transplant recipients are prone to cytomegalovirus pneumonia. Ganciclovir given early in the post-transplant period is effective in reducing the impact of post-transplant cytomegalovirus disease. Other drugs often given as prophylaxis for post-transplant infection include the following: acyclovir for herpes simplex and varicella-zoster; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for Pneumocystis pneumonia; amphotericin B or other antifungal agent for fungal infections, primarily candidiasis and aspergillosis; isoniazid for tuberculosis; and a third-generation cephalosporin or other antibiotics for bacterial infections. The antibiotics often are given before, during, and shortly after operation to prevent wound infections and other infections directly associated with the procedure.
++
Immunosuppressive therapy in transplant patients also predisposes to infections. Corticosteroids in high doses used to help prevent rejection or graft-versus-host disease, inhibit T-cell proliferation, T-cell–dependent immunity, and the expression of cytokine genes and thus have major effects on cellular immunity, antibody formation, and inflammation. Patients receiving high doses of corticosteroids are increasingly prone to fungal and other infections. Cyclosporine, a peptide, and tacrolimus, a macrolide, act on T-cell function to prevent rejection. Other immunosuppressive drugs and anti-lymphocyte serum also are used. Collectively, the immunosuppressive agents can provide a setting where infections occur in transplant recipients.
++
Case 19 presents a patient with bone marrow transplantation and includes comments on the infections that occur in that setting.
+
Fishman
JA, Issa
NC: Infection in organ transplantation.
Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010;24:273.
[PubMed: 20466270]
+
Freifeld
AG, Bow
EJ, Sepkowitz
KA
et al.: Clinical practice guideline for the use of antimicrobial agents in neutropenic patients with cancer: 2010 update by the infectious diseases society of America.
Clin Infect Dis 2011;52:e56–93.
[PubMed: 21258094]
++
CASE 19: BONE MARROW TRANSPLANTATION
A 30-year-old man with chronic myelogenous leukemia underwent an allogeneic bone marrow transplant from a human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-matched sibling donor. Prior to the transplant, the patient received total-body radiation and high-dose cyclophosphamide to permanently destroy his leukemia, hematopoietic, and lymphoid cells.
++
The first infectious complication appeared at 10 days post-transplantation, before engraftment had occurred. The patient had mucositis, enteritis, and severe neutropenia with a white blood cell count of 100 cells/μL (normal, 3400–10,000 cells/μL). He was receiving prophylactic ceftazidime, fluconazole, acyclovir, and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole. However, he became febrile to 39°C and looked sick. The clinical impression was probable bacterial sepsis related to the neutropenia, with the likely source being either his mouth or his gastrointestinal tract. Another possibility was infection of the central line used for his intravenous therapy. A fungal infection, either with Candida in the blood or Aspergillus pneumonia, would also be possible; however, these infections generally occur later following allogeneic bone marrow transplantation. The patient had been started on cyclosporine and low-dose prednisone therapy shortly after the bone marrow transplant to prevent graft-versus-host disease, which predisposed him to other opportunistic infections, but these also were less likely in the first few weeks following transplant.
++
When his condition worsened on post-transplant day 10, he was thought to have a bacterial infection. A blood culture was obtained, and the gram-negative antibiotic coverage was changed from ceftazidime to meropenem. Vancomycin was added pending the result of the blood culture. The fluconazole was changed to voriconazole. On day 12, the blood culture was reported positive for viridans streptococci. The patient improved. The antibiotic therapy was continued until his white blood cell count increased to over 1000/μL.
++
On day 30 post-transplant, the patient was discharged to home care. He was engrafted and was no longer neutropenic but was receiving cyclosporine and prednisone therapy for mild graft-versus-host disease.
++
On day 60 post-transplant, the patient developed fever, nausea, marked epigastric pain, and diarrhea. The clinical impression was cytomegalovirus enteritis or worsening graft-versus-host disease involving the gastrointestinal tract. Between day 30 and 60, the cyclosporine and prednisone therapy had gradually been decreased as his graft-versus-host disease had been stable. On day 60, the patient was admitted to hospital and examined by upper and lower gastrointestinal endoscopy. Mucosal lesions consistent with cytomegalovirus infection were seen and biopsied. On histologic examination, large intranuclear inclusion bodies consistent with cytomegalovirus infection were seen. Cultures were positive for cytomegalovirus. The patient was treated with ganciclovir and recovered.
++
The patient did well until day 120, when he developed abnormal liver function tests and diarrhea. Colonoscopy yielded a diagnosis of worsening graft-versus-host disease. His cyclosporine and prednisone dosages were increased.
++
On day 150 post-transplant, he developed fever and cough and was found to have multiple pulmonary infiltrates. The most likely diagnosis was fungal pneumonia, probably due to Aspergillus species, although P jirovecii and viral pneumonia were also possible. The patient underwent bronchoscopy with lavage and transbronchial biopsy. Cultures of the biopsy tissue grew Aspergillus fumigatus. The patient was treated with voriconazole. This therapy was continued for 2 weeks in the hospital and then daily on an outpatient basis for 3 more weeks. The cyclosporine and prednisone dosages were decreased also.
++
By day 300, the patient was free of opportunistic infections. His graft-versus-host disease subsided, and his cyclosporine and prednisone dosages were tapered and then the drugs were discontinued. His chronic myelogenous leukemia remained in remission. He returned to work full time 330 days after his bone marrow transplant.
++
Patients who undergo bone marrow transplantation receive ablative chemotherapy and radiation therapy to destroy their hematopoietic and immune systems. The result is severe neutropenia and abnormal cellular immunity until the transplanted marrow engrafts. Because of the neutropenia, bone marrow transplantation patients are at especially high risk for infection compared with patients who receive solid organ transplants and are not neutropenic. Patients who have allogeneic bone marrow transplantation are also at risk for graft-versus-host disease, which does not occur in persons who have autologous bone marrow transplantation (ie, receive their own previously harvested bone marrow or stem cells). The immunosuppressive therapy used to control the graft-versus-host disease also helps provide a setting where patients are at high risk for infection.
++
The infections and the times they are likely to occur are shown in Figure 48-1. During the first month post-transplant, before engraftment occurs, there is severe neutropenia and damaged mucosal surfaces because of the pre-transplant chemotherapy and radiation therapy. The patients are at greatest risk for infections caused by gram-negative and gram-positive bacteria that often are part of the normal microbiota of the skin, gastrointestinal tract, and respiratory tract. Recurrent herpes simplex virus infection may also occur at this time.
++
++
In the second and third months, after engraftment has occurred, the patients have continued impairment of humoral and cellular immunity. This impairment is more severe and persistent in patients with acute graft-versus-host disease. The major infections are interstitial pneumonia (about 50% caused by cytomegalovirus), Aspergillus pneumonia, bacteremia, candidemia, and viral respiratory infections.
++
After 3 months post-transplant, there is gradual recovery of both humoral and cellular immunity. This reconstitution takes 1–2 years and can be significantly impaired by chronic graft-versus-host disease. Patients are at risk for varicella-zoster infections and for respiratory tract infections, usually with encapsulated bacteria such as S pneumoniae (Chapter 14) and H influenzae (Chapter 18).
++
Prophylactic antimicrobial therapy is routinely used in bone marrow transplantation patients. Trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole is given for 6 months or the duration of immunosuppression to prevent Pneumocystis pneumonia. Acyclovir is given from the time of transplantation until engraftment occurs to prevent herpes simplex infection. Intravenous ganciclovir often is given early after transplantation and followed by oral acyclovir or oral ganciclovir to help prevent severe cytomegalovirus disease; the use of this prophylaxis varies depending on whether the donor, the recipient, or both have evidence of prior cytomegalovirus infection. Fluoroquinolones or third-generation cephalosporins may be given during the engraftment period to help prevent bacterial infections. Antifungal agents—fluconazole, posaconazole, or voriconazole (depending on whether graft-versus-host disease is present)—may be used as prophylaxis for fungal disease. The use of vancomycin to prevent infections by gram-positive bacteria is controversial, in part because of potential selection for vancomycin-resistant enterococcal infection. After the immune system has returned to normal function, reimmunization with tetanus and diphtheria toxoids, pneumococcal and H influenzae polysaccharide vaccines, and killed viral vaccines (eg, polio, influenza) should be considered.
+
Safdar
A, Armstrong
D: Infections in patients with hematologic neoplasms and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: neutropenia, humoral and splenic defects.
Clin Infect Dis 2011;53:798–806.
[PubMed: 21890754]
+
Wingard
JR, Hsu
J, Hiemenz
JW: Hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: an overview of infection risks and epidemiology.
Infect Dis Clin North Am 2010;24:257.
[PubMed: 20466269]
+
Young
JH, Weisdorf
DJ: Infections in recipients of hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. In Bennett JE, Dolin R, Blaser MJ (editors). Mandell, Douglas, and Bennett’s Principles and Practice of Infectious Diseases, 8th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier Saunders, 2015, p. 3425.
++
The following cases discuss novel emerging infections. In such events, priority is placed on the diagnosis, isolation and treatment of infected individuals, and on the monitoring of spread, containment and control within the population at risk.
++
CASE 20: SEVERE ACUTE RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS (SARS-CoV), HONG KONG, 2003
On February 11, 2003, the Chinese Ministry of Health notified the World Health Organization (WHO) that 305 cases of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) of unknown etiology had occurred in Guangdong province with transmission to health care workers and household contacts. Five deaths were reported.
++
On February 26, a man who had traveled in mainland China and Hong Kong was hospitalized in Hanoi, Vietnam with a respiratory illness; he later died. Health care providers in Hanoi subsequently developed a similar illness. In late February a second cluster was reported in Hong Kong linked to a patient who had traveled to southern China.
++
Most patients with SARS presented with upper respiratory viral symptoms leading to pneumonia. Mortality rates were approximately 10%, with higher mortality in patients older than 65 years.
++
On March 12, WHO issued a global alert about the outbreak and instituted worldwide surveillance. By March 19, 264 patients from 11 countries were reported. Intensive containment efforts were instituted, including airport screening, isolation, and large-scale quarantine.
++
Testing of samples by electron microscopy and virus microarray demonstrated a novel coronavirus, named SARS-CoV. The virus was spread by respiratory droplets and close person-to-person contact. The natural host of SARS-CoV is thought to be bats, with civet cats as intermediate hosts causing human infections in animal markets.
++
During the SARS epidemic, more than 8000 probable cases and 774 deaths were reported from 29 countries. Since 2004, there have not been any known cases of SARS reported anywhere in the world.
+
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome-worldwide, 2003. MMWR 2003;52:226.
+
Ksiazek
TG, Erdman
D, Goldsmith
CS
et al.: A novel coronavirus associated with severe acute respiratory syndrome.
N Engl J Med 2003;348:1953.
[PubMed: 12690092]
+
Peiris
JSM, Yuen
KY, Osterhaus
ADME
et al.: The severe acute respiratory syndrome.
N Engl J Med 2003;349:2431.
[PubMed: 14681510]
+
Wang
D, Urisman
A, Liu
YT
et al.: Viral discovery and sequence recovery using DNA microarrays. PLoS Biol 2003;1:257.
++
CASE 21: AVIAN INFLUENZA, 2003–2014
Multiple influenza A types are circulating in wild and domesticated bird populations worldwide and are classified into low pathogenic avian influenza A (LPAI) and highly pathogenic influenza A (HPAI) types based on the hemagglutinin (H) and neuraminidase (N) gene segments. Sporadic human infections occur, with low pathogenic types are associated with generally mild illness, while highly pathogenic types range from mild disease to death. The best known example of HPAI is H5N1, but other subtypes can cause severe human disease, including H7N7 and H9N2.
++
Since November 2003, more than 600 sporadic cases of human infection with highly pathogenic avian influenza A (H5N1) have been reported, primarily by 15 countries in Asia, Africa, the Pacific, Europe, and the Near East. Indonesia, Vietnam, and Egypt have the highest number of reported cases to date. On January 8, 2014, the first case of human infection with H5N1 in the Americas was reported in Canada. Approximately 60% of cases have died.
++
Human infections with H7N9 avian influenza were reported in China in March 2013, with 132 cases and 44 deaths. Most patients have had severe respiratory illness, with about one-third resulting in death. New reports of human H7N9 infection were less frequent during May–December 2013. The decrease in cases was likely due to closure of live bird markets along with the change in weather. Since January 2014 the frequency of reported cases has increased, coinciding with the arrival of cooler weather.
++
The majority of infected persons have close contact with sick or dead poultry or wild birds, but there is evidence that limited nonsustained human-to-human transmission after prolonged close contact has occurred in some clusters.
++
The primary concern about avian influenza is the emergence of a novel strain with sustained human-to-human transmissibility that maintains high virulence for naïve individuals. Gain-of-function experiments have demonstrated that five substitutions are sufficient to transform H5N1 virus into an airborne-transmissible pathogen. Performing these gain-of-function experiments is controversial, and they are highly regulated to ensure that the strains are not accidentally released, or that the information can be used by terrorist groups to engineer highly pathogenic viruses.
+
Linster
M, van Boheemen
S, de Graaf
M
et al.: Identification, characterization, and natural selection of mutations driving airborne transmission of A/H5N1 virus.
Cell 2014;157:329.
[PubMed: 24725402]
++
CASE 22: HANTAVIRUS, YOSEMITE VALLEY, 2012
On August 16, 2012, the National Park Service announced two confirmed cases of hantavirus pulmonary syndrome (HPS) in visitors to Yosemite National Park, California. By November 10, there were a total of 10 confirmed cases, with 3 of these fatal.
++
The park visitors had stayed at Curry Village tent cabins, which had insulation between the exterior canvas and interior walls. Deer mice infestations were detected in the insulation, exposing the guests to rodent urine and droppings, which contain infectious virus.
++
Patients developed fever, chills, myalgia, headache, and gastrointestinal symptoms, progressing to respiratory distress and shock. Approximately 26,000 visitors were notified of their potential exposure. The cabins were extensively decontaminated and reconstructed to eliminate areas that could serve as mouse habitats.
+
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Hantavirus pulmonary syndrome in visitors to a national park–Yosemite Valley, California, 2012.
MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep 2012;61:952.
[PubMed: 23169317]
++
CASE 23: MIDDLE EASTERN RESPIRATORY SYNDROME CORONAVIRUS (MERS-CoV), SAUDI ARABIA, 2012
In 2012, a novel coronavirus virus was discovered from a patient who died of pneumonia in Saudi Arabia.
++
On September 20, 2012, a physician in Saudi Arabia sent a respiratory virus culture from a patient with pneumonia to the laboratory of Dr. Fouchier in the Netherlands for identification. The virus was identified by next-generation sequencing as a novel coronavirus, related to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV). Over the next several months, hundreds of cases were documented, with over 250 deaths by July 1, 2014. Cases were found in countries in or near the Arabian Peninsula and travelers returning from these countries. Most patients with severe disease were elderly or had medical comorbidities, overall mortality is about 30% for reported cases but is likely lower due to the absence of reporting of mild cases.
++
MERS-CoV presents with acute respiratory illness and fever, progressing to pneumonia. The virus has been shown to spread from person to person through close contact, but there is no evidence of sustained community spreading.
++
MERS-CoV is thought to be originally derived from bats. Camels in affected areas were found to be seropositive, and may be an intermediate host for transmission to humans. Cases and clusters of MERS infection are continuing to be investigated. PCR is used for diagnosis, and there is no specific treatment, though supportive care substantially improves case outcomes.
+
Coleman
CM, Frieman
MB: Emergence of the Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus.
PLoS Pathogens 2013;9:e1003595.
[PubMed: 24039577]
++
CASE 24: EBOLA OUTBREAK, WESTERN AFRICA, 2014
On March 21, 2014, the Guinea Ministry of Health reported an outbreak among 49 persons of an illness characterized by fever, diarrhea, and vomiting with a case-fatality rate of 59%. Specimens tested at the Pasteur Institute in France were positive for Ebola virus (species Zaire Ebola virus).
++
By March 30, cases were reported in neighboring Liberia, and cases were identified in Sierra Leone in May. As of June 18, this had become the largest Ebola virus disease outbreak ever documented, with a combined 528 cases and 337 deaths (64% case-fatality rate).
++
Cases were characterized by sudden onset of fever and malaise with headache, myalgia, vomiting, and diarrhea. Around 30–50% of the patients experienced hemorrhagic symptoms. The incubation period is typically 8–10 days, but can range from 2 to 21 days. Patients with severe disease develop thrombocytopenia, bleeding, and multiorgan failure leading to shock and death.
++
While the definitive host species has not been identified, evidence supports fruit bats as one reservoir. The virus initially transfers to humans upon contact with infected wildlife, and is then spread person-to-person through direct contact with body fluids such as blood, urine, sweat, semen, and breast milk. Viral particles can be found in semen up to 61 days after illness onset from recovered cases. Many patients in Africa are thought to have become infected after handling of deceased relatives through customary burial practices.
++
Diagnosis is made through detection of Ebola virus antigen, RNA, or antibodies in blood. Patient care is supportive, with aggressive fluid and electrolyte replacement. Novel vaccines and treatments are currently being developed and tested on a case basis.
++
As of April 2015, there were a total number of over 25,000 suspect and confirmed cases, with over 10,000 deaths. Outbreak control measures have been enhanced with mandatory quarantine and disposal of infected bodies, intensive tracking and monitoring efforts, and international provision of medical supplies and training. International flights from the outbreak region have instituted passenger screening for fever and associated symptoms. These measures have substantially reduced the number of new cases, particularly in the most affected areas in Liberia and Sierra Leone.
++
Imported cases have been identified in Nigeria, Senegal, the United States, Spain, Mali and the United Kingdom. In Nigeria, localized transmission led to 20 cases, but subsequent spread in the country was stopped. While the risk of additional infected patients entering the United States is low, health care workers are advised to be alert for signs and symptoms of Ebola virus disease in travelers returning from the outbreak regions. These patients are to be strictly isolated while diagnostic tests are pending.
++
The combination of a novel highly virulent viral disease with an immunologically naïve population and sustained person-to-person spread is extremely concerning and poses a substantial risk to global health. The limited medical resources of the affected countries make it extremely difficult to treat patients and halt transmission. Response to this outbreak requires high-level regional and international cooperation with provision of outbreak response experts, trained health care workers, and personal protective equipment and other medical supplies. Failure to contain this or similar outbreaks could lead to a widespread epidemic with devastating consequences.