+++
Wounds, Tissues, Bones, Abscesses, and Fluids
++
Microscopic study of smears and culture of specimens from wounds or abscesses often gives early and important indications of the nature of the infecting organism and thus helps in the choice of antimicrobial drugs. Specimens from diagnostic tissue biopsies should be submitted for microbiologic as well as histologic examination. Such specimens for bacteriologic examination are submitted fresh, without fixatives or disinfectants, and are cultured by a variety of methods.
++
The pus in closed, undrained soft tissue abscesses frequently contains only one organism as the infecting agent; most commonly staphylococci, streptococci, or enteric gram-negative rods. The same is true in acute osteomyelitis, where the organisms can often be cultured from blood before the infection has become chronic. Multiple microorganisms are frequently encountered in abdominal abscesses and abscesses contiguous with mucosal surfaces as well as in open wounds. When deep suppurating lesions, such as chronic osteomyelitis, drain onto exterior surfaces through a sinus or fistula, the microbiota of the surface through which the lesion drains must not be mistaken for that of the deep lesion. Instead, specimens should be aspirated from the primary infection through uninfected tissue.
++
Bacteriologic examination of pus from closed or deep lesions must include culture by anaerobic methods. Anaerobic bacteria (Bacteroides, Fusobacteria, etc) sometimes play an essential causative role, and mixtures of aerobes and anaerobes are often present.
++
The methods used for cultures must be suitable for the semiquantitative recovery of common bacteria and also for recovery of specialized microorganisms, including mycobacteria and fungi. Eroded skin and mucous membranes are frequently the sites of yeast or fungus infections. Candida, Aspergillus, and other yeasts or fungi can be seen microscopically in smears or scrapings from suspicious areas and can be grown in cultures. Treatment of a specimen with KOH and calcofluor white greatly enhances the observation of yeasts and molds in the specimen.
++
Exudates that have collected in the pleural, peritoneal, pericardial, or synovial spaces must be aspirated with aseptic technique. If the material is frankly purulent, smears and cultures are made directly. If the fluid is clear, it can be centrifuged and the sediment used for stained smears and cultures. The culture method used must be suitable for the growth of organisms suspected on clinical grounds—for example, mycobacteria, anaerobic organisms—as well as the commonly encountered pyogenic bacteria. Some fluid specimens clot, and culture of an anticoagulated specimen may be necessary. The following chemistry and hematology results are suggestive of infection: specific gravity greater than 1.018, protein content greater than 3 g/dL (often resulting in clotting), and white cell counts greater than 500–1000/μL. Polymorphonuclear leukocytes (PMNs) predominate in acute untreated pyogenic infections; lymphocytes or monocytes predominate in chronic infections. Transudates resulting from neoplastic growth may grossly resemble infectious exudates by appearing bloody or purulent and by clotting on standing. Cytologic study of smears or of sections of centrifuged cells may demonstrate the neoplastic nature of the process.
++
Since bacteremia frequently portends life-threatening illness, its early detection is essential. Blood culture is the single most important procedure to detect systemic infection due to bacteria. It provides valuable information for the management of febrile, acutely ill patients with or without localizing symptoms and signs and is essential in any patient in whom infective endocarditis is suspected even if the patient does not appear acutely or severely ill. In addition to its diagnostic significance, recovery of an infectious agent from the blood provides invaluable aid in determining antimicrobial therapy. Every effort should therefore be made to isolate the causative organisms in bacteremia.
++
In healthy persons, properly obtained blood specimens are sterile. Although microorganisms from the normal respiratory and gastrointestinal microbiota occasionally enter the blood, they are rapidly removed by the reticuloendothelial system. These transients rarely affect the interpretation of blood culture results. If a blood culture yields microorganisms, this fact is of great clinical significance provided that contamination can be excluded. Contamination of blood cultures with normal skin microbiota is most commonly due to errors in the blood collection procedure. Therefore, proper technique in performing a blood culture is essential.
++
The following rules, rigidly applied, yield reliable results:
++
Use strict aseptic technique. Wear gloves—they do not have to be sterile.
Apply a tourniquet and locate a fixed vein by touch. Release the tourniquet while the skin is being prepared.
Prepare the skin for venipuncture by cleansing it vigorously with 70–95% isopropyl alcohol. Using 2% tincture of iodine or 2% chlorhexidine, start at the venipuncture site and cleanse the skin in concentric circles of increasing diameter. Allow the antiseptic preparation to dry for at least 30 seconds. Do not touch the skin after it has been prepared.
Reapply the tourniquet, perform venipuncture, and (for adults) withdraw approximately 20 mL of blood.
Add the blood to aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles.
Properly label and promptly transport the specimens to the laboratory.
++
Several factors determine whether blood cultures will yield positive results: the volume of blood cultured, the dilution of blood in the culture medium, the use of both aerobic and anaerobic culture media, and the duration of incubation. For adults, 20 mL per culture is usually obtained, and half is placed in an aerobic blood culture bottle and half in an anaerobic one, with one pair of bottles comprising a single blood culture. Commercial manufacturers of blood culture systems optimize the broth composition, volume, and antibiotic neutralizing agents used (activated charcoal or resin beads). Automated blood culture systems use a variety of methods to detect positive cultures. These automated methods allow frequent monitoring of the cultures—as often as every few minutes—and earlier detection of positive ones. The media in the automated blood culture systems are so enriched and the detection systems so sensitive that blood cultures using the automated systems do not need to be processed for more than 5 days. In general, subcultures are indicated only when the machine indicates that the culture is positive. Manual blood culture systems are obsolete and are likely to be used only in laboratories in developing countries that lack the resources to purchase automated blood culturing systems. In manual systems, the blood culture bottles are examined two or three times a day for the first 2 days and daily thereafter for 1 week. In the manual method, blind subcultures of all the blood culture bottles on days 2 and 7 may be necessary.
++
The number of blood specimens that should be drawn for cultures and the period of time over which this is done depend in part on the severity of the clinical illness. In hyperacute infections, eg, gram-negative sepsis with shock or staphylococcal sepsis, it is appropriate to obtain a minimum of two blood cultures from different anatomic sites, preferably through peripheral venipuncture. More recent literature has suggested that three to four blood cultures may be necessary. In other bacteremic infections, eg, subacute endocarditis, three blood specimens should be obtained over 24 hours. A total of three blood cultures yields the infecting bacteria in more than 95% of bacteremic patients. If the initial three cultures are negative and occult abscess, fever of unexplained origin, or some other obscure infection is suspected, additional blood specimens should be cultured when possible before antimicrobial therapy is started.
++
It is necessary to determine the significance of a positive blood culture. The following criteria may be helpful in differentiating “true positives” from contaminated specimens:
++
Growth of the same organism in repeated cultures obtained at different times from separate anatomic sites strongly suggests true bacteremia.
Growth of different organisms in different culture bottles suggests contamination but occasionally may follow clinical problems such as wound sepsis or ruptured bowel.
Growth of normal skin microbiota, eg, coagulase-negative staphylococci, diphtheroids (corynebacteria and propionibacteria), or anaerobic gram-positive cocci, in only one of several cultures suggests contamination. Growth of such organisms in more than one culture or from specimens from a high-risk patient, such as an immunocompromised bone marrow transplant recipient, enhances the likelihood that clinically significant bacteremia exists.
Organisms such as viridans streptococci or enterococci are likely to grow in blood cultures from patients suspected to have endocarditis, and gram-negative rods such as E coli are likely to grow in blood cultures from patients with clinical gram-negative sepsis. Therefore, when such “expected” organisms are found, they are more apt to be etiologically significant.
++
The following are the bacterial species most commonly recovered in positive blood cultures: staphylococci, including S aureus; viridans streptococci; enterococci, including Enterococcus faecalis; gram-negative enteric bacteria, including E coli and K pneumoniae; P aeruginosa; pneumococci; and Haemophilus influenzae. Candida species, other yeasts, and some dimorphic fungi such as H capsulatum grow in blood cultures, but many fungi are rarely, if ever, isolated from blood. CMV and HSV can occasionally be cultured from blood, but most viruses and rickettsiae and chlamydiae are not cultured from blood. Parasitic protozoa and helminths do not grow in blood cultures.
++
In most types of bacteremia, examination of direct blood smears is not useful. Diligent examination of Gram-stained smears of the buffy coat from anticoagulated blood will occasionally show bacteria in patients with S aureus infection, clostridial sepsis, or relapsing fever. In some microbial infections (eg, anthrax, plague, relapsing fever, rickettsiosis, leptospirosis, spirillosis, psittacosis), inoculation of blood into animals may give positive results more readily than does culture. In practicality, this is never done in clinical laboratories and diagnosis may be made by alternate means such as serology or nucleic acid amplification tests.
++
Bacteriologic examination of the urine is done mainly when signs or symptoms point to urinary tract infection, renal insufficiency, or hypertension. It should always be done in persons with suspected systemic infection or fever of unknown origin. It is desirable for women in the first trimester of pregnancy to be assessed for asymptomatic bacteriuria.
++
Urine secreted in the kidney is sterile unless the kidney is infected. Uncontaminated bladder urine is also normally sterile. The urethra, however, contains a normal microbiota, so that normal voided urine contains small numbers of bacteria. Because it is necessary to distinguish contaminating organisms from etiologically important organisms, only quantitative urine examination can yield meaningful results.
++
The following steps are essential in proper urine examination.
+++
A. Proper Collection of Specimen
++
Proper collection of the specimen is the single most important step in a urine culture and the most difficult. Satisfactory specimens from females are problematic.
++
Have at hand a sterile, screw-cap specimen container and two to three gauze sponges soaked with nonbacteriostatic saline (antibacterial soaps for cleansing are not recommended).
Spread the labia with two fingers and keep them spread during the cleansing and collection process. Wipe the urethra area once from front to back with each of the saline gauzes.
Start the urine stream and, using the urine cup, collect a midstream specimen. Properly label the cup.
++
The same method is used to collect specimens from males; the foreskin should be kept retracted in uncircumcised males.
++
Catheterization carries a risk of introducing microorganisms into the bladder, but it is sometimes unavoidable. Separate specimens from the right and left kidneys and ureters can be obtained by the urologist using a catheter at cystoscopy. When an indwelling catheter and closed collection system are in place, urine should be obtained by sterile aspiration of the catheter with needle and syringe, not from the collection bag. To resolve diagnostic problems, urine can be aspirated aseptically directly from the full bladder by means of suprapubic puncture of the abdominal wall. This procedure is usually done in infants.
++
For most examinations, 0.5 mL of ureteral urine or 5 mL of voided urine is sufficient. Because many types of microorganisms multiply rapidly in urine at room or body temperature, urine specimens must be delivered to the laboratory rapidly or refrigerated not longer than overnight. Alternatively, transport tubes that contain boric acid may be used if specimens cannot be refrigerated.
+++
B. Microscopic Examination
++
Much can be learned from simple microscopic examination of urine. A drop of fresh uncentrifuged urine placed on a slide, covered with a coverglass, and examined with restricted light intensity under the high-dry objective of an ordinary clinical microscope can reveal leukocytes, epithelial cells, and bacteria if more than 105/mL are present. Finding at least 105 organisms per milliliter in a properly collected and examined urine specimen is strong evidence of active urinary tract infection. A Gram-stained smear of uncentrifuged midstream urine that shows gram-negative rods is diagnostic of a urinary tract infection.
++
Brief centrifugation of urine readily sediments pus cells, which may carry along bacteria and thus may help in microscopic diagnosis of infection. The presence of other formed elements in the sediments—or the presence of proteinuria—is of little direct aid in the specific identification of active urinary tract infection. Pus cells may be present without bacteria, and, conversely, bacteriuria may be present without pyuria. The presence of many squamous epithelial cells, lactobacilli, or mixed flora on culture suggests improper urine collection.
++
Some urine dipsticks contain leukocyte esterase and nitrite, measurements of polymorphonuclear cells and bacteria, respectively, in the urine. Positive reactions are strongly suggestive of bacterial urinary tract infection, while negative reactions for both indicate a low likelihood of urinary tract infection, except for neonates and immunocompromised patients.
++
Culture of the urine, to be meaningful, must be performed quantitatively. Properly collected urine is cultured in measured amounts on solid media, and the colonies that appear after incubation are counted to indicate the number of bacteria per milliliter. The usual procedure is to spread 0.001–0.05 mL of undiluted urine on blood agar plates and other solid media for quantitative culture. All media are incubated overnight at 37°C; growth density is then compared with photographs of different densities of growth for similar bacteria, yielding semiquantitative data.
++
In active pyelonephritis, the number of bacteria in urine collected by ureteral catheter is relatively low. While accumulating in the bladder, bacteria multiply rapidly and soon reach numbers in excess of 105/mL—far more than could occur as a result of contamination by urethral or skin microbiota or from the air. Therefore, it is generally agreed that if more than 105 colonies/mL are cultivated from a properly collected and properly cultured urine specimen, this constitutes strong evidence of active urinary tract infection. The presence of 105 bacteria or more of the same type per milliliter in two consecutive specimens establishes a diagnosis of active infection of the urinary tract with 95% certainty. If fewer bacteria are cultivated, repeated examination of urine is indicated to establish the presence of infection.
++
The presence of fewer than 104 bacteria per milliliter, including several different types of bacteria, suggests that organisms come from the normal microbiota and are contaminants, usually from an improperly collected specimen. The presence of 104/mL of a single type of enteric gram-negative rod is strongly suggestive of urinary tract infection, especially in men. Occasionally, young women with acute dysuria and urinary tract infection will have 102–103/mL. If cultures are negative but clinical signs of urinary tract infection are present, “urethral syndrome,” ureteral obstruction, tuberculosis of the bladder, gonococcal infection, or other disease must be considered.
++
Meningitis ranks high among medical emergencies, and early, rapid, and precise diagnosis is essential. Diagnosis of meningitis depends on maintaining a high index of suspicion, securing adequate specimens properly, and examining the specimens promptly. Because the risk of death or irreversible damage is great unless treatment is started immediately, there is rarely a second chance to obtain pretreatment specimens, which are essential for specific etiologic diagnosis and optimal management.
++
The most urgent diagnostic issue is the differentiation of acute purulent bacterial meningitis from “aseptic” and granulomatous meningitis. The immediate decision is usually based on the cell count, the glucose concentration and protein content of CSF, and the results of microscopic search for microorganisms (see Case 1, Chapter 48). The initial impression is modified by the results of culture, serologic tests, nucleic acid amplification tests, and other laboratory procedures. In evaluating the results of CSF glucose determinations, the simultaneous blood glucose level must be considered. In some central nervous system neoplasms, the CSF glucose level is low.
++
As soon as infection of the central nervous system is suspected, blood samples are taken for culture, and CSF is obtained. To obtain CSF, perform lumbar puncture with strict aseptic technique, taking care not to risk compression of the medulla by too rapid withdrawal of fluid when the intracranial pressure is markedly elevated. CSF is usually collected in three to four portions of 2–5 mL each, in sterile tubes. This permits the most convenient and reliable performance of tests to determine the several different values needed to plan a course of action.
+++
B. Microscopic Examination
++
Smears are made from the sediment of centrifuged CSF. Using a cytospin centrifuge to prepare the slides for staining is recommended because it concentrates cellular material and bacterial cells more effectively than standard centrifugation. Smears are stained with Gram stain. Study of stained smears under the oil immersion objective may reveal intracellular gram-negative diplococci (meningococci), intra- and extracellular lancet-shaped gram-positive diplococci (pneumococci), or small gram-negative rods (H influenzae or enteric gram-negative rods).
++
Cryptococcal antigen in CSF may be detected by a latex agglutination or EIA test. Bacterial antigen detection tests have been developed but have fallen out of favor as they are not more sensitive than routine Gram stain.
++
The culture methods used must favor the growth of microorganisms most commonly encountered in meningitis. Sheep blood and chocolate agar together grow almost all bacteria and fungi that cause meningitis. The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis requires cultures on special media (see Table 47-2 and Chapter 23). Viruses causing aseptic meningitis or meningoencephalitis, such as herpes simplex, enterovirus, JC virus, and mumps, can be best detected by nucleic acid amplification methods.
+++
E. Follow-Up Examination of Cerebrospinal Fluid
++
The return of the CSF glucose level and cell count toward normal is good evidence of adequate therapy. The clinical response is of paramount importance.
+++
Respiratory Secretions
++
Symptoms or signs often point to involvement of a particular part of the respiratory tract, and specimens are chosen accordingly. In interpreting laboratory results, it is necessary to consider the normal microbiota of the area from which the specimen was collected.
++
1. Throat—Most “sore throats” are due to viral infection. Only 5–10% of “sore throats” in adults and 15–20% in children are associated with bacterial infections. The finding of a follicular yellowish exudate or a grayish membrane must arouse the suspicion that Lance-field group A β-hemolytic streptococcal, diphtherial, gonococcal, fusospirochetal, or candidal infection exists; such signs may also be present in infectious mononucleosis, adenovirus, and other virus infections.
++
Throat swabs are taken from each tonsillar area and from the posterior pharyngeal wall without touching the tongue or the buccal mucosa. The normal throat microbiota includes an abundance of viridans streptococci, neisseriae, diphtheroids, staphylococci, small gram-negative rods, and many other organisms. Microscopic examination of smears from throat swabs is of little value in streptococcal infections, because all throats harbor a predominance of streptococci.
++
Cultures of throat swabs are most reliable if inoculated promptly after collection. Media selective for streptococci can be used to culture for group A streptococci. In streaking selective media for streptococci or blood agar culture plates, it is essential to spread a small inoculum thoroughly and avoid overgrowth by normal microbiota. This can be done readily by touching the throat swab to one small area of the plate and using a second, sterile applicator (or sterile bacteriologic loop) to streak the plate from that area. Detection of β-hemolytic colonies is facilitated by slashing the agar (to provide reduced oxygen tension) and incubating the plate for 2 days at 37°C.
++
Over the last two decades, a variety of antigen detection tests, probe methods, and nucleic acid amplification tests have been developed to enhance the detection of Streptococcus pyogenes from throat swabs in patients with acute streptococcal pharyngitis. It is important that the user realizes that only S pyogenes will be detected or excluded by these tests, and thus, they cannot be relied on to diagnose bacterial pharyngitis caused by other pathogens. Current recommendations indicate performing culture on certain patients with suspected group A streptococcal throat infections, particularly in the pediatric setting, who have negative rapid test results, unless the rapid tests have been shown to be as sensitive as culture methods.
++
2. Nasopharynx—Nasopharyngeal swabs are most commonly used in the diagnosis of respiratory viral infections. Whooping cough is diagnosed by culture of B pertussis from nasopharyngeal or nasal washings or by PCR amplification of B pertussis DNA in the specimen.
++
3. Middle ear—Specimens are rarely obtained from the middle ear because puncture of the tympanic membrane is necessary. In acute otitis media, 30–50% of aspirated fluids are bacteriologically sterile. The most frequently isolated bacteria are pneumococci, H influenzae, Moraxella catarrhalis, and hemolytic streptococci.
++
4. Lower respiratory tract—Bronchial and pulmonary secretions of exudates are often studied by examining sputum. The most misleading aspect of sputum examination is the almost inevitable contamination with saliva and mouth microbiota. Thus, finding candida, S aureus, or even S pneumoniae in the sputum of a patient with pneumonitis has no etiologic significance unless supported by the clinical picture. Meaningful sputum specimens should be expectorated from the lower respiratory tract and should be grossly distinct from saliva. Sputum may be induced by the inhalation of heated hypertonic saline aerosol for several minutes. In pneumonia accompanied by a pleural effusion, the pleural fluid may yield the causative organisms more reliably than does sputum. In suspected tuberculosis, gastric washings (swallowed sputum) may yield organisms when expectorated material is not obtainable, eg, in the pediatric patient.
++
5. Transtracheal aspiration, bronchoscopy, lung biopsy, bronchoalveolar lavage—The microbiota in such specimens often reflects accurately the events in the lower respiratory tract. Specimens obtained by bronchoscopy may be necessary in the diagnosis of Pneumocystis pneumonia or infection due to Legionella or other organisms. Bronchoalveolar lavage specimens are particularly useful in immunocompromised patients with diffuse pneumonia.
+++
B. Microscopic Examination
++
Smears of purulent flecks or granules from sputum stained by Gram stain or acid-fast methods may reveal causative organisms and PMNs. The presence of many squamous epithelial cells suggests heavy contamination with saliva and such samples will be rejected for culture; a large number of PMNs suggests a purulent exudate from infection.
++
The media used for sputum cultures must be suitable for the growth of bacteria (eg, pneumococci, Klebsiella), fungi (eg, C immitis), mycobacteria (eg, M tuberculosis), and other organisms. Specimens obtained by bronchoscopy and lung biopsy should also be cultured on other media (eg, for anaerobes, Legionella, and others). The relative prevalence of different organisms in the specimen must be estimated. Only a finding of one predominant organism or the simultaneous isolation of an organism from both sputum and blood can clearly establish its role in a pneumonic or suppurative process. Laboratories in hospitals that have large transplant populations often have comprehensive algorithms for specimens that are obtained by bronchoscope that include a variety of diagnostic methods including NAATs and other techniques for broad pathogen detection.
+++
Gastrointestinal Tract Specimens
++
Acute symptoms referable to the gastrointestinal tract, particularly nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea, are commonly attributed to infection. In reality, most such attacks are caused by intolerance to food or drink, enterotoxins, drugs, or systemic illnesses.
++
Many cases of acute infectious diarrhea are due to viruses, which cannot be grown in tissue culture. On the other hand, many viruses that can be grown in culture (eg, adenoviruses, enteroviruses) can multiply in the gut without causing gastrointestinal symptoms. Similarly, some enteric bacterial pathogens may persist in the gut following an acute infection. Thus, it may be difficult to assign significance to a bacterial or viral agent cultured from the stool, especially in subacute or chronic illness.
++
These considerations should not discourage the physician from attempting laboratory isolation of enteric organisms but should constitute a warning of some common difficulties in interpreting the results.
++
The lower bowel has an exceedingly large normal bacterial microbiota. The most prevalent organisms are anaerobes (Bacteroides, gram-positive rods, and gram-positive cocci), gram-negative enteric organisms, and E faecalis. Any attempt to recover pathogenic bacteria from feces involves separation of pathogens from the normal microbiota, usually through the use of differential selective media and enrichment cultures. Important causes of acute gastroenteritis include viruses, toxins (of staphylococci, clostridia, vibrios, toxigenic E coli), shigellae and salmonellae, and campylobacters. The relative importance of these groups of organisms differs greatly in various parts of the world.
++
Feces and rectal swabs are the most readily available specimens. Bile obtained by duodenal drainage may reveal infection of the biliary tract. The presence of blood, mucus, or helminths must be noted on gross inspection of the specimen. Leukocytes seen in suspensions of stool examined microscopically or detection of the leukocyte-derived protein lactoferrin are useful means of differentiating inflammatory from noninflammatory diarrhea, but do not distinguish infection from noninfectious gastrointestinal conditions. Special techniques must be used to search for parasitic protozoa and helminths and their ova.
++
Specimens are suspended in broth and cultured on ordinary as well as differential media (eg, MacConkey agar, EMB agar) to permit separation of non–lactose-fermenting gram-negative rods from other enteric bacteria. If salmonella infection is suspected, the specimen is also placed in an enrichment medium (eg, selenite F broth) for 18 hours before being plated on differential media (eg, Hektoen enteric or Shigella-Salmonella agar). Yersinia enterocolitica is more likely to be isolated after storage of fecal suspensions for 2 weeks at 4°C, but it can be isolated on yersinia or Shigella-Salmonella agar incubated at 25°C. Vibrios grow best on thiosulfate-citrate-bile salts-sucrose (TCBS) agar. Thermophilic campylobacters are isolated on Campy lobacter agar or Skirrow’s selective medium incubated at 40–42°C in 10% CO2 with greatly reduced O2 tension. Bacterial colonies are identified by standard bacteriologic methods or MS. Agglutination of bacteria from suspect colonies by pooled specific antiserum is often the fastest way to establish the presence of salmonellae or shigellae in the intestinal tract.
+++
C. Non–Culture-Based Methods
++
EIAs for detection of specific enteric pathogens, either directly in stool specimens or to confirm growth in broth or on plated media, are available. EIAs that detect Shiga toxins 1 and 2 in suspected cases of colitis caused by enterohemorrhagic E coli (also called Shiga toxin–producing E coli or STEC) are available and are superior to culture. Also available are EIAs for direct detection of viral pathogens such as rotavirus, adenoviruses 40 and 41, and noroviruses; bacterial pathogens such as Campylobacter jejuni; and the protozoan parasites Giardia lamblia, Cryptosporidium parvum, and Entamoeba histolytica. The performance of these assays is variable. Nucleic acid testing panels are available for the direct detection of gastrointestinal pathogens in stool. Specimen requirements and the organisms present on each panel vary by manufacturer.
++
Intestinal parasites and their ova are identified by microscopic study of fresh fecal specimens. The specimens require special handling in the laboratory and multiple specimens may be needed to diagnose low-level infections (see Chapter 46). Nucleic acid testing can be used to detect some parasites.
+++
Sexually Transmitted Diseases
++
The causes of the genital discharge of urethritis in men are N gonorrhoeae, C trachomatis, and Ureaplasma urealyticum. Endocervicitis in women is caused by N gonorrhoeae and C trachomatis. The genital sores associated with diseases in both men and women are often caused by HSV, less commonly T pallidum (syphilis) or Haemophilus ducreyi (chancroid), uncommonly lymphogranuloma venereum serovars of C trachomatis, and rarely Klebsiella granulomatis (granuloma inguinale). Each of these diseases has a characteristic natural history and evolution of lesions, but one can mimic another. The laboratory diagnosis of most of these infections is covered elsewhere in this book. A few diagnostic tests are listed below and outlined in Table 47-2.
++
A stained smear of a urethral or a cervical exudate that shows intracellular gram-negative diplococci strongly suggests gonorrhea. The sensitivity is about 90% for men and 50% for women—thus, culture or a nucleic acid amplification test is recommended for women. Exudate, rectal swab, or throat swab must be plated promptly on special media to yield N gonorrhoeae. Molecular methods to detect N gonorrhoeae DNA in urethral or cervical exudates or urine are more sensitive than culture.
+++
B. Chlamydial Genital Infections
++
See later section in this chapter on the diagnosis of chlamydial infections.
++
See Chapter 33 and the later section in this chapter on the diagnosis of viral infections.
++
Dark-field or immunofluorescence examination of fresh tissue fluid expressed from the base of the chancre may reveal typical T pallidum, but this testing is rarely clinically available. Serologic tests for syphilis become positive 3–6 weeks after infection. A positive nontreponemal test (eg, VDRL or RPR) requires confirmation. A positive immunofluorescent treponemal antibody test (eg, FTA-ABS, T pallidum particle agglutination [TP-PA], or the newer Treponema EIAs and chemiluminescence assays—see Chapter 24) proves syphilitic infection.
++
Smears from a suppurating lesion usually show a mixed bacterial flora. Swabs from lesions should be cultured at 33°C on two or three media that are selective for H ducreyi. Serologic tests are not helpful. Culture is only about 50% sensitive, so diagnosis and treatment are often made empirically based on a typical presentation. Molecular assays are used in some reference or research laboratories.
+++
F. Granuloma Inguinale
++
Klebsiella (formerly Calymmatobacterium) granulomatis, the causative agent of this hard, granulomatous, proliferating lesion, can be grown in complex bacteriologic media, but this is rarely attempted and very difficult to perform successfully. Histologic demonstration of intracellular “Donovan bodies” in biopsy material most frequently supports the clinical impression. Serologic tests are not helpful. Molecular assays are used in some reference or research laboratories.
+++
G. Vaginosis/Vaginitis
++
Bacterial vaginosis associated with Gardnerella vaginalis or Mobiluncus (see Chapter 21 and Case 13, Chapter 48) is diagnosed in the examining room by inspection of the vaginal discharge; the discharge (1) is grayish and sometimes frothy, (2) has a pH above 4.6, (3) has an amine (“fishy”) odor when alkalinized with potassium hydroxide, and (4) contains “clue cells,” large epithelial cells covered with gram-negative or gram-variable rods. Similar observations are used to diagnose Trichomonas vaginalis (see Chapter 46) infection; the motile organisms can be seen in wet-mount preparations or cultured from genital discharge. Trichomonas culture, DNA probes, and NAATs are much more sensitive than wet-mount procedures. Candida albicans vaginitis is diagnosed by finding yeast or pseudohyphae in a potassium hydroxide preparation of the vaginal discharge, by probes, or by culture.